評論
打印
A:Defcon 5 means“no danger”.Defcon 1 is a crisis.
甲:五級戰備狀態意味著“沒有危險”。一級戰備狀態才是危機來臨。
B:How can 5 not be worse than 1?
乙:五級怎么會還不如一級？
A:Yeah, Star Trek V worse than I.
甲:就是啊，《星際迷航5》比1難看。
B:Okay, first of all, that's a comparison of quality, not intensity. Secondly, Star Trek I is orders-of-magnitude worse than Star Trek V.
乙:首先來說，我們比較的是影片的品質而不是激烈程度。再說，《星戰迷航1》差5 不止一個數量級。
A:Are you joking? Star Trek V is the standard against which all badness is measured.
甲:你開什么玩笑？《星際迷航5》簡直就是沒有最爛只有更爛的最好訟釋。
B:No, no. Star Trek V has specific failures in writing and direction, while Star Trek I fails across the board: art direction, costuming, music, sound editing.
乙:不對，不對。《星際迷航5》只是劇本失敗，導演很爛。但《星際迷航1》所有部 分都很爛：藝術執導、服裝、配樂、音效剪輯。
A:Can we just forget I said Defcon and go?
甲:我們可以不要再糾結戰備狀態了嗎？趕快走吧。
B:Star Trek V.
乙:《星際迷航5》。
