評論
打印
No. 8: All right, let's talk about it. Let's get it in here. I'd like to see it again. Mr. Foreman? (The Foreman tells the guard to bring in the knife.)
8號陪審員：好啊，我們就來談?wù)劇０训赌玫竭@兒來吧。陪審長先生，我能再看看那把刀嗎？（陪審長讓法警把刀子拿進(jìn)來。）
No. 4: The knife was pretty strong evidence, don't you think?
4號陪審員：這把刀就是鐵證，你不這樣認(rèn)為嗎？
No. 8: I do.
8號陪審員：對，沒錯(cuò)。
No. 4: Good! Now suppose we take these facts one at a time. One, the boy admitted going out of the house at 8 o'clock at the night of the murder, after being hit several times by his father. Two, he went directly to a neighborhood junk shop and bought one of those switch knives. Three, he met some friends of his in front of the tavern at around 8:45. Am I right so far?
4號陪審員：好極了！現(xiàn)在讓我們將這些事實(shí)逐一展開。一、這個(gè)男孩承認(rèn)在案發(fā)當(dāng)晚被父親打了幾下后，在八點(diǎn)左右離開家。二、他徑直走到附近一家舊貨店并在那里買了一把這種彈簧刀。三、大約在晚上8點(diǎn)45分左右，這個(gè)男孩在小酒館前遇到了幾位朋友。我說得都對吧？
No. 8: Yes, you are.
8號陪審員：是的，沒錯(cuò)。
No. 4: He talked to his friends for about an hour, leaving at 9:45. During this time, they saw the switch knife. Four, they identified the death weapon in court as that very knife. Five, he arrived home at about 10 o'clock. Now this is where the stories offered by the state and the boy begin to diverge slightly. He claimed that he went to a movie at about 11:30, returning home at 3:10 to find his father dead and himself arrested. Now what happened to the switch knife? He claimed that it fell through a hole in his pocket on his way to the movie theater sometime between 11:30 and 3:30. Now these are the details, gentlemen.
4號陪審員：他跟這幾位朋友聊了大約一小時(shí)，然后在9點(diǎn)45分離開了那里。期間，他的朋友們都看到了這把彈簧刀。四、他們在法庭上指認(rèn)了那件兇器就是他們看到的那把刀。五、他在大概10點(diǎn)鐘回到了家。從這里開始，控方所與這個(gè)男孩的說法開始有輕微的出入。他聲稱他在大約11點(diǎn)30分去了電影院，3點(diǎn)10分回到家時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)父親已經(jīng)死亡，隨即自己便被拘捕起來。那么那把彈簧刀呢？他說在11點(diǎn)30分到3點(diǎn)30分之間的某個(gè)時(shí)間，在去電影院的路上，刀從衣服口袋的洞里掉了。先生們，這就是具體細(xì)節(jié)。
