評論
打印
Essentially the exact opposite of Pennebaker. Results? Identical. Those who wrote about their peak experiences, their best experiences,
這個做法和尼貝克的做法相反。結果呢？完全一樣。那些寫下他們巔峰經驗的人、寫下最快樂經歷的人，
visited the doctor's office less time- in other words, it strengthened their physiological immune system and experienced more happiness. So both psychological and physiological results.
去看醫生的次數少了。就是說，這個做法增強了他們的身體免疫系統、讓他們體驗更多快樂——不論心理還是身體上都得到同樣的效果
Now when you look at this, some of you may be thinking that "well, what about the Lyubomirsky study?"
現在來看，你們有些人可能會想：“那魯伯米斯基的研究呢？”
Remember the Lyubomirsky study? That said when you write about positive emotions. Actually you feel worse.
還記得魯伯米斯基的研究嗎？那項研究表示，當你寫下積極情感時，其實你感覺更糟
Whereas you write about negative emotions, you do feel better as Pennebaker suggested. Here's the difference.
而寫下負面情感都會如尼貝克所說，感覺會好些。不同之處在于
The instructions that Laura King gave were mostly, were mostly about describing and re-experiencing, replaying your experience.
勞拉·金的做法主要是描述和重新體驗、重現你的經歷
It wasn't about analyzing "why did it happen", "how did it"... It was rather how it happen- in other words, replaying it.
而不是分析“怎么會發生這種情況”，而是它的發生過程——就是重現
When the instructions- and this is the Lyubomirsky study- were analyze the experience: why it happened, how did you get there and so on and so on.
當做法——而魯伯米斯基的研究是分析這種經歷為什么會發生，你為什么會遇上之類的
That's why it had the negative consequences over time, but just replaying the experience, just writing about how wonderful it is,
這就是為什么隨著時間推移會產生負面效果、但只是重現經歷、只寫下這次經歷有多美好、
re-experiencing emotionally what that was- that actually let you benefit.
重新體驗當時的情感——實際上卻會讓你受益
