評論
打印
And here's what he finds he looks at their English scores: the "fast spurters" improved significantly more than any of the other students.
他發現，他查看他們的英語成績"快速迸發"學生有明顯進步比任何學生的進步都快
He looked at their maths scores, because English is not really objective
他查看他們的數學成績因為英語不夠客觀
and you know maybe it was the teachers who thought they were better than they were really.
也許是老師們覺得某些學生英語更好
So he looked at their maths, their objective scores.
于是他查看他們的數學，客觀的成績
These students improved significantly more than any of the other students.
這些學生也有明顯進步比其他任何學生的進步都大
But here is the clincher: Robert Rosenthal administered once again an IQ test for all the students.
接下來才是有決定性的結果 Robert Rosenthal又對所有學生進行了一次智商測試
And what he found was the students who were labeled randomly so, but who were labeled
他發現被標簽為被隨機地標簽為"快速迸發"的學生
"fast spurters", their IQ increased significantly over the year and maintained that increase in a longitudinal study.
智商在一年間有很大增加 而且在長期研究中保持著增加
Now this is my bog I mean: IQ is supposed to be in your intelligent quotient that you are born with! It's immutable.
這讓人不解智商本來是生而有之的 它是恒定的
It doesn't change from the day you were born to the day you die or so they thought.
從出生到死亡時都不會改變或者說他們這樣認為
It changed significantly just based the belief that the teacher had in her/his students.
但它卻因為老師對學生的信念而改變
Belief as self-fulfilling prophecies.
信念即自我實現預言
What happened in the study?
這項研究說明了什么？
Was it that the teachers were fooled?
老師們被騙了嗎？
And suddenly were made to see an illusion? No.
突然產生幻象? 不是的
It was that they were alluded before.
是因為他們之前被欺騙
and the illusion was that they didn't see what is right in front of their very eyes,
幻象是他們看不到就在他們眼前的東西
