評論
打印
B Bad for children
B 對小孩有害
With reference to your 'Little Spenders are Big Spenders' article, children should not be used as actors in TV commercials.
關于你的“小消費者就是大消費者”這篇文章，電視廣告不應該由童星拍廣告。
It is illegal for them to work in factories, so why are they allowed to make commercials?
小孩在工廠工作是違法的，那么為什么允許小孩拍商業廣告呢？
Regarding the high salaries, it is bad for children to have too much money. --Li Yue
至于高薪，小孩擁有過多的錢財對他們有害。—李樂
C Silly toys
C 無趣的玩具
Advertising to children is wrong because it makes them ask their parents for money to buy things.
廣告對小孩有害，因為廣告使他們向父母要錢買東西。
In addition, many things advertised, such as toys, are silly and encourage violence.
另外，許多廣告中的物品比如玩具，都是無趣和慫恿暴力的。
A child buying these toys will learn nothing. --Zhang Jie
購買這些玩具的小孩會一無所獲。—張杰
D Nothing wrong with commercials
D 商業廣告無害
I disagree that commercials are bad for children.
我不同意商業廣告對小孩有害。
They cannot be harmful or the government would have banned them long ago.
它們不可能有危害，否則政府早就禁止了。
Furthermore, what is wrong with children earning money or asking their parents to buy things for them?
而且，孩子們賺錢或叫父母給他們買東西有什么不對呢？
My final point is that children buy toys to have fun with, not to learn from.
我最后想說的是，孩子們買玩具是為了娛樂，而不是為了學習。
This explains why the 'Magic Babies' are one of the world's best-selling toys, ever.
這就解釋了為什么“魔力寶貝”曾是全球最暢銷的玩具之一。
-- Liu Ping, Sunshine Advertising
—劉萍，陽光廣告社
