評(píng)論
打印
We're ordering it the right way, but we're also simplifying the rules so that they're human-readable
我們以正確的順序排列信息，但同時(shí)我們也在簡化規(guī)則，使其簡單易懂，
so that people can actually understand themselves when something is against our terms and when something is not.
這樣人們就能理解哪些行為違反了條例，哪些沒有。
And then we're making -- again, our big focus is on removing the burden of work from the victims.
接下來我們——正如我剛才所說，現(xiàn)在工作的重點(diǎn)是減少受害者的操作壓力。
So that means push more towards technology, rather than humans doing the work
這意味著繼續(xù)發(fā)展科技，代替真人做這些工作，
that means the humans receiving the abuse and also the humans having to review that work.
真人會(huì)接收侮辱信息，同時(shí)還要親自舉報(bào)。
So we want to make sure that we're not just encouraging more work around something that's super, super negative,
所以我們并不希望我們一步步朝一些負(fù)面的東西發(fā)展，
and we want to have a good balance between the technology and where humans can actually be creative, which is the judgment of the rules,
我們希望在科技和人類創(chuàng)新中取得平衡，讓人類來審查規(guī)則，
and not just all the mechanical stuff of finding and reporting them. So that's how we think about it.
而非機(jī)械地發(fā)現(xiàn)問題，報(bào)告問題。以上就是我們的想法。
I'm curious to dig in more about what you said. I mean, I love that you said you are looking for ways to
我想進(jìn)一步了解你剛剛講的事。我的意思是，我很開心聽到你說你在尋求方法
re-tweak the fundamental design of the system to discourage some of the reactive behavior, and perhaps,
來調(diào)整重構(gòu)系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)，來阻止一些反應(yīng)性行為，并且或許
to use Tristan Harris-type language, engage people's more reflective thinking.
引用特里斯坦·哈里斯的說法——鼓勵(lì)人們反思。
How far advanced is that? What would alternatives to that "like" button be?
你現(xiàn)在進(jìn)行到哪一步？你準(zhǔn)備用什么功能來代替“喜歡”功能？
