評(píng)論
打印
So we're actually looking for conduct. Conduct being using the service to repeatedly or episodically harass someone,
所以我們實(shí)際上在研究行為模式。比如說(shuō)，有人利用這個(gè)平臺(tái)來(lái)持續(xù)或是間斷性地騷擾他人，
using hateful imagery that might be associated with the KKK or the American Nazi Party.
利用可憎的意象，比如可能與3K黨有關(guān)的意象，或是與美國(guó)納粹黨有關(guān)的。
Those are all things that we act on immediately. We're in a situation right now where that term is used fairly loosely,
這些都是我們會(huì)立即處理的問(wèn)題。現(xiàn)在，這些術(shù)語(yǔ)被使用的次數(shù)相對(duì)較多，用詞不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，
and we just cannot take any one mention of that word accusing someone else as a factual indication that they should be removed from the platform.
所以我們不能因?yàn)橛腥颂岬竭@些單詞，就指控某人有罪，并且以此為證據(jù)將他們趕出這個(gè)平臺(tái)。
So a lot of our models are based around, number one: Is this account associated with a violent extremist group? And if so,
所以我們的許多模型要檢測(cè)的第一件事是：這個(gè)賬號(hào)是否與暴力極端組織有聯(lián)系？如果答案是肯定的，
we can take action. And we have done so on the KKK and the American Nazi Party and others.
那我們可以采取措施。我們對(duì)于3K黨、美國(guó)納粹黨以及其他組織就采取了措施。
And number two: Are they using imagery or conduct that would associate them as such as well?
第二個(gè)問(wèn)題：這些賬號(hào)是否在使用與上述組織有關(guān)的圖片，或是其行為是否與上述組織有關(guān)？
How many people do you have working on content moderation to look at this?
你安排了多少人給賬號(hào)行為評(píng)分，來(lái)檢查這些行為？
It varies. We want to be flexible on this, because we want to make sure that we're,
人數(shù)不固定。我們希望能靈活應(yīng)對(duì)這件事，因?yàn)槲覀兿氡ＷC，
number one, building algorithms instead of just hiring massive amounts of people,
第一，建立算法而不是雇傭大量的人，
because we need to make sure that this is scalable, and there are no amount of people that can actually scale this.
因?yàn)槲覀冞@項(xiàng)任務(wù)是會(huì)延展的雇多少人都會(huì)顯得不夠。
So this is why we've done so much work around proactive detection of abuse that humans can then review.
這就是為什么我們要努力建立能積極檢測(cè)辱罵信息的系統(tǒng)，然后讓人來(lái)審閱這些信息。
We want to have a situation where algorithms are constantly scouring every single tweet
我們希望可以做到讓算法能夠不斷檢測(cè)所有的推文，
and bringing the most interesting ones to the top so that humans can bring their judgment to whether we should take action or not, based on our terms of service.
把其中問(wèn)題最大的挑出來(lái)，這樣人就可以決定到底要不要采取措施，基于我們的服務(wù)條款。
