評論
打印
And implicit in all four of these is the understanding that, as they increase, the conversation gets healthier and healthier.
而這四個指標背后蘊含意思是指標越高，談話的質量就越高。
So our first step is to see if we can measure these online, which we believe we can. We have the most momentum around receptivity.
所以第一步是試驗是否能在網上檢測這些指標，我們內心持肯定的態度。我們在感受性方面勢頭較大。
We have a toxicity score, a toxicity model, on our system that can actually measure
我們在系統中建立了反感分，一個反感模型，它能夠檢測
whether you are likely to walk away from a conversation that you're having on Twitter because you feel it's toxic,
在推特上你是否會終止某個你正在參與的話題，因為這個話題讓你感到不快，
with some pretty high degree. We're working to measure the rest, and the next step is, as we build up solutions,
并且是非常不愉快。我們正在努力測量其他指標，而下一步是，在我們制定解決方案之后，
to watch how these measurements trend over time and continue to experiment.
觀察這些指標長期的趨勢走向，并且繼續試驗。
And our goal is to make sure that these are balanced, because if you increase one, you might decrease another. If you increase variety of perspective,
我們的目標是保證這些指標的平衡，因為一個指標的提升可能會導致另一個的降低。如果你提高觀點的多樣性，
you might actually decrease shared reality. Just picking up on some of the questions flooding in here. Constant questioning.
可能就會導致共同現實值的降低。讓我們選擇屏幕上的一些問題提問。持續不斷地發問。
A lot of people are puzzled why, like, how hard is it to get rid of Nazis from Twitter?
許多人好奇為什么，比如，從Twitter上清除納粹分子有多難？
So we have policies around violent extremist groups, and the majority of our work and our terms of service works on conduct, not content.
我們對于暴力極端組織制定了規則，而我們的大部分工作和服務條款是研究用戶行為，而非網站內容。
