評論
打印
Having different voting patterns that just wasn't an issue back then
進而認為他們具有不同的投傾向，在當時這還算不上一個問題
Yeah I think there's a question here first
應該是這位女士先舉的手
Yeah it's the less the people and the parties the regions versus the parties
有時政黨的矛盾并不在個人與個人間，而是產生在地區與地區之間
Yeah there is a lot of evidence that would support that
沒錯，很多證據都能支持這個觀點
You look at the progressive Republicans like Theodore Roosevelt to be much more
像西奧多·羅斯福這樣的進步共和黨人
in line with the Democratic Party, except when it comes to the issue of military imperialism
就與民主黨的政見較為一致，除了在軍事帝國主義這種問題之外
So sometimes you got to look at the issue basis, but in general
所以有時候我們要看到事情本身，但總體而言
we could say certainly in an election like 1904
我們可以說，像1904年的那次大選當中
Definitely I mean the Democrat was far more conservative than the Republican overall
民主黨人就比共和黨人更偏向于保守
When you had in the 1950s, you basically have four groups
在1950年代，形成了4大群體
you have the conservative Democrats, the liberal Democrats, the conservative Republicans and the liberal Republicans
分別為保守派民主黨、自由派民主黨、保守派共和黨和自由派共和黨
You have something like called conservative coalition
于是形成了一種稱為保守派同盟的關系
which was Democrats from the south and the conservative Republicans that emerged in the late 1940s to fight against Franklin Roosevelt
它是由南部的民主黨和在1940年代出現的保守派共和黨組成的共同對抗富蘭克林·羅斯福
and that persisted through the 1950s, so we really sort of a four way divide partly it depends on the issues
這種狀況持續了整個1950年代，像這種四分法多多少少是由具體的問題出發的
