評論
打印
But even more impression through Seneca's observations about why the spectacle of torture can co,
但是通過塞內(nèi)加的觀察中更深的印象是為什么折磨的壯觀景象能夠
as he says, coerce and master the mind.
如他所說，強(qiáng)迫和控制思想
They overwhelm the capacity for coping and the implication is that the human sensory
它們戰(zhàn)勝了應(yīng)對的能力含義就是人類感覺
and reactive capacities can absorb only so much before shutting down.
和反應(yīng)的能力在關(guān)閉之前只能吸收這么多
And this is indeed the point of the work that you cite Bill by Judith Herman in um
這確實(shí)是研究的重點(diǎn)比爾，你引用朱迪絲?赫爾曼
"Trauma and Recovery" certain threats and encounters with violence or traumatic she says quote
在《創(chuàng)傷和復(fù)原》的話她認(rèn)為，某些威脅，暴力遭遇或者創(chuàng)傷性，引述
"Because they overwhelm the " ordinary human adaptions to life."
因?yàn)樗鼈儜?zhàn)勝了普通人適應(yīng)生活的
This I think is what Seneca is pointing to.
我認(rèn)為這也是塞內(nèi)加要表達(dá)的意思
Now Seneca has in mind torture that is not interrogation
塞內(nèi)加認(rèn)為，折磨不是審訊
I presume it's torture for spectacle, punishment or sadistic need
我推測是為了觀賞性的折磨懲罰或者虐待狂的需要
and maybe torture that's motivated by the need for extracting intelligence reputedly
也許折磨是出于據(jù)說是為了獲取情報的需要
so since most of you reject that it's a, a, an effective method um,
因此，既然你們中很多人都拒絕這是種有效方法
and the victim they believe correctly or not that he has some control in stopping the torture
他們相信，受害者，無論正確與否他在停止折磨中有掌控能力
but the main point to understand here and underscore is Seneca's concession
但是理解的重點(diǎn)是強(qiáng)調(diào)的是塞內(nèi)加讓步
that some impressions of dread lead not only to jolts and shocks
對恐懼的印象不僅會導(dǎo)致震驚和沖擊
but to full blooded terror in most of us.
還會讓我們大多人恐懼
Now, so there's this idea of nipping an emotion in the bud, catching the orra and then squelching it.
現(xiàn)在，有種思想是把一種情感消滅在萌芽狀態(tài)抓住它，然后消滅它
