評論
打印
And you go year back early to the days of Tammany Hall
回到坦慕尼協(xié)會仍存在之時
It's interesting they're awful lot of presidential candidates who came out of New York
曾有多位總統(tǒng)候選人來自紐約的候選人
Who made their reputation fighting against Tammany Hall, fighting for good government
聲稱反對坦慕尼協(xié)會的暗箱操作，認為應該建立一個清白的政府
Some of those were democrats, some were republicans
這些人有的來自民主黨，有的來自共和黨
But it was such a issue that became a campaign issue itself was the struggle against the political machines
但當時，大選的焦點話題之一就是與政治集團之間的斗爭
Yeah great comment! yes! I believe so
謝謝你的評論！請?zhí)釂枺∥蚁胧沁@樣的
Does anyone know our polls are mostly done by phone?
你們不知道民意調(diào)查大部分是通過電話進行嗎?
So the comment is i was involved in the discussion with some people today found the fact thatthe young people 28 and under don't have landlines.我想說的是今天我在和一些人討論了之后發(fā)現(xiàn)28歲以下的年輕人幾乎都不用固定電話。
And I was making phone call for my candidate, You know, all landline numbers
我為候選人做過電話調(diào)查，但調(diào)查名單上的號碼都是固話號碼
Can you not do polls on cell phones?
對手機用戶不能進行民意調(diào)查嗎?
Oh, I never even thought of that
我從來沒想過這個問題
That would totally mass up the poll, wouldn't it
要是這樣，調(diào)查不會難進行嗎?
Well the pollsters must have a equation to take that into count
不過調(diào)查者總能用他們的"公式"計算出一個結果
I don't know you do it
不知道具體是怎么操作的
I mean it's all really mystery to me
這對我來說一直是個謎
My temptation would almost tell the pollster the opposite of what I think
我充其量只是向調(diào)查者說出違心的想法
It just sort of ear-test to me there's no supposition to know how the elections gonna come out before it happens
我總覺得這種不正式的調(diào)查無法在大選真正結束前預測出其結果
Right, The comment was in 1932 election telephone polling showing Hoover beating F.D.R was quite the opposite
對，他說1932年大選中電話調(diào)查結果顯示胡佛將會擊敗羅斯福，但結果相反
Well pollsters have made a lot of advances since then but they still get beat sometime
現(xiàn)在的調(diào)查者應該比那時進步多了，不過有時他們還是會出錯
It doesn't always turn out the way they think
有時結果并不如他們所愿
And the technology is changing as we just brought that up and attitudes towards about polling changed
調(diào)查的手段在逐漸發(fā)展但人們對民調(diào)的態(tài)度也在改變
