日韩色综合-日韩色中色-日韩色在线-日韩色哟哟-国产ts在线视频-国产suv精品一区二区69

手機APP下載

您現在的位置: 首頁 > 在線廣播 > 視頻廣播 > 每日視頻新聞 > 正文

每日視頻新聞:四川雅安7.0級地震 逾百人死亡數千傷

來源:可可英語 編輯:kahn ?  可可英語APP下載 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet
aamy1g35D)Y1.l#!=]

6N,FoNGe5vRZ8X(EgoTE

President Obama Speaks on Common-Sense Measures to Reduce Gun Violence

%9m=U7v(@r-vqzU-=(,

奧巴馬談減少槍支暴力常識性措施

GXxkM]A]L=Zw5


rY9WN]5Hnu

MR. BARDEN: Hello. My name is Mark Barden. Just four months ago, my wife Jackie and I lost our son, and our children, James and Natalie, they lost their little brother Daniel. Daniel was a first-grader at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Our sweet, 7-year-old Daniel was one of 20 children, six adults lost on December 14th. I have to say it feels like it was just yesterday.

;p]&nit2QNNI5E0.kF4m


@uJwlO+I.[Go@sM2WNR

In our deepest grief, we were supported by the love of our families and comforted by the love and prayers we received from millions of America, from every corner of the country.

hfuWot|%xjRgN


M)^Gy^x-afnW

What happened in Newtown can happen anywhere. In any instant, any dad in America could be in my shoes. No one should feel the pain. No one should feel our pain or the pain felt by the tens of thousands of people who’ve lost loved ones to senseless gun violence.

.q*pH4Tkr4hc


A#R51k+&~rRem@

And that's why we're here. Two weeks ago, 12 of us from Newtown came to meet with U.S. senators and have a conversation about how to bring common-sense solutions to the issues of gun violence. We came with a sense of hope, optimistic that real conversation could begin that would ultimately save the lives of so many Americans. We met with dozens of Democrats and Republicans and shared with them pictures of our children, our spouses, our parents who lost their lives on December 14th.

JEKJ%y)sBIM#L


=3jYUnZ-hMVJk)^3iv

Expanded background checks wouldn't have saved our loved ones, but still we came to support the bipartisan proposal from two senators, both with “A” ratings from the NRA -- a common-sense proposal supported by 90 percent of Americans. It‘s a proposal that will save lives without interfering with the rights of responsible, law-abiding gun owners.

#=rh%TStmC-6x;p


RN_M^EnuYcg

We'll return home now, disappointed but not defeated. We return home with the determination that change will happen -- maybe not today, but it will happen. It will happen soon. We've always known this would be a long road, and we don't have the luxury of turning back. We will keep moving forward and build public support for common-sense solutions in the areas of mental health, school safety, and gun safety.

vMnfHOwro6UKHPQ-N=


lJ.*uDbZio

We take strength from the children and loved ones that we lost, and we carry a great faith in the American people.

,UHl)5)mwer8Y(Wu#qq]


[[zkuL1M)=KJD&zH

On behalf of the Sandy Hook Promise, I would like to thank President Obama, Vice President Biden for their leadership and for standing strong and continuing to fight for a safer America. I would like to thank Senators Toomey, Manchin, Schumer and Kirk on coming together to seek common ground on legislation that would keep guns out of the hands of criminals and save lives.

V-[42O]Y.V5pMQgD7


*RAzGw17)&FxJh

And I would like to thank Connecticut’s Senators Blumenthal and Murphy. They’ve been right with us. They stood by us right from the very beginning. From the first few hours after this tragedy they were with us.

zkt5c94(ctA#J


)1!GBh4*h0X5PaN*C49&

We will not be defeated. We are not defeated, and we will not be defeated. We are here now; we will always be here because we have no other choice. We are not going away. And every day, as more people are killed in this country because of gun violence, our determination grows stronger.

k-a97DJ[4D


4lmECqsUz6Z6gt+Sw2

We leave Washington hoping that others, both here and across the country, will join us in making the Sandy Hook Promise, a pledge that we'd had great hope that more U.S. senators would take literally. I'd like to end by repeating the words with which the Sandy Hook Promise begins: Our hearts are broken. Our spirit is not.

DlyNuF8+wbxceTy


bY2&e8Lkn-d=rfA%B

Thank you. It is now my great pleasure to introduce the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama.

y^vGZ!Rd+&&sF,7H%lP


G_rU(S)oDqe]cJ

THE PRESIDENT: A few months ago, in response to too many tragedies -- including the shootings of a United States Congresswoman, Gabby Giffords, who’s here today, and the murder of 20 innocent schoolchildren and their teachers –- this country took up the cause of protecting more of our people from gun violence.

_r56k]]Nw[U-V=


9CCzcq92PMs#DFt]

Families that know unspeakable grief summoned the courage to petition their elected leaders –- not just to honor the memory of their children, but to protect the lives of all our children. And a few minutes ago, a minority in the United States Senate decided it wasn’t worth it. They blocked common-sense gun reforms even while these families looked on from the Senate gallery.

U|C=*uIkljf|eY


QgE#HN^cfe

By now, it’s well known that 90 percent of the American people support universal background checks that make it harder for a dangerous person to buy a gun. We’re talking about convicted felons, people convicted of domestic violence, people with a severe mental illness. Ninety percent of Americans support that idea. Most Americans think that's already the law.

TTpK71HJ=u-EPfX%c_Jg


ZUtmnezDsvc2UW9U

And a few minutes ago, 90 percent of Democrats in the Senate just voted for that idea. But it’s not going to happen because 90 percent of Republicans in the Senate just voted against that idea.

SQOMbj@)4-!M


rs^UP0(5Mhz

A majority of senators voted “yes” to protecting more of our citizens with smarter background checks. But by this continuing distortion of Senate rules, a minority was able to block it from moving forward.

iaBr%V.BqMMJvBNpjg


KJmlevaj,rTXK%

I’m going to speak plainly and honestly about what’s happened here because the American people are trying to figure out how can something have 90 percent support and yet not happen. We had a Democrat and a Republican -– both gun owners, both fierce defenders of our Second Amendment, with “A” grades from the NRA -- come together and worked together to write a common-sense compromise on background checks. And I want to thank Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey for their courage in doing that. That was not easy given their traditional strong support for Second Amendment rights.

]P[[7gDS~(a


dtKO-a]fpnqJlR

As they said, nobody could honestly claim that the package they put together infringed on our Second Amendment rights. All it did was extend the same background check rules that already apply to guns purchased from a dealer to guns purchased at gun shows or over the Internet. So 60 percent of guns are already purchased through a background check system; this would have covered a lot of the guns that are currently outside that system.

,h4d0S41YkDx


rIvF]|a^72

Their legislation showed respect for gun owners, and it showed respect for the victims of gun violence. And Gabby Giffords, by the way, is both -- she’s a gun owner and a victim of gun violence. She is a Westerner and a moderate. And she supports these background checks.

wpr=K.eJgh


q)~qO2#33bKyQCu!n

In fact, even the NRA used to support expanded background checks. The current leader of the NRA used to support these background checks. So while this compromise didn’t contain everything I wanted or everything that these families wanted, it did represent progress. It represented moderation and common sense. That’s why 90 percent of the American people supported it.

#p*9R#SQ;h*e-d5


DTVnWYymc6YG&3,Ps

But instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill. They claimed that it would create some sort of “big brother” gun registry, even though the bill did the opposite. This legislation, in fact, outlawed any registry. Plain and simple, right there in the text. But that didn’t matter.

X.PwQMOD!IQ&jaG=xiT


F^[ksXnrsPd7P#Clv8Y

And unfortunately, this pattern of spreading untruths about this legislation served a purpose, because those lies upset an intense minority of gun owners, and that in turn intimidated a lot of senators. And I talked to several of these senators over the past few weeks, and they’re all good people. I know all of them were shocked by tragedies like Newtown. And I also understand that they come from states that are strongly pro-gun. And I have consistently said that there are regional differences when it comes to guns, and that both sides have to listen to each other.

Qv.)FF^_YFY


qODTs~2Uwe!2

But the fact is most of these senators could not offer any good reason why we wouldn’t want to make it harder for criminals and those with severe mental illnesses to buy a gun. There were no coherent arguments as to why we wouldn’t do this. It came down to politics -- the worry that that vocal minority of gun owners would come after them in future elections. They worried that the gun lobby would spend a lot of money and paint them as anti-Second Amendment.

kntr2G,xG*_3T^~eJ1Fe


eGkghQv.Stj=WL;

And obviously, a lot of Republicans had that fear, but Democrats had that fear, too. And so they caved to the pressure, and they started looking for an excuse -- any excuse -- to vote “no.”

Ju~xm@79JkRJ


&4-snaK-FJM(#HLuE^

One common argument I heard was that this legislation wouldn’t prevent all future massacres. And that’s true. As I said from the start, no single piece of legislation can stop every act of violence and evil. We learned that tragically just two days ago. But if action by Congress could have saved one person, one child, a few hundred, a few thousand -- if it could have prevented those people from losing their lives to gun violence in the future while preserving our Second Amendment rights, we had an obligation to try.

)Lrbuyj+T]DyXGt7%EQY


gr(.)Auulp

And this legislation met that test. And too many senators failed theirs.

&Rvg6PaYGNdk


Hq-2;S2d.[d

I've heard some say that blocking this step would be a victory. And my question is, a victory for who? A victory for what? All that happened today was the preservation of the loophole that lets dangerous criminals buy guns without a background check. That didn’t make our kids safer. Victory for not doing something that 90 percent of Americans, 80 percent of Republicans, the vast majority of your constituents wanted to get done? It begs the question, who are we here to represent?

qIjM*CzE*PKC~p.tDjD


Jx3H74V7-(

I've heard folks say that having the families of victims lobby for this legislation was somehow misplaced. "A prop," somebody called them. “Emotional blackmail,” some outlet said. Are they serious? Do we really think that thousands of families whose lives have been shattered by gun violence don’t have a right to weigh in on this issue? Do we think their emotions, their loss is not relevant to this debate?

kxe*lQm~E_q|SQ=30fFa


+cm1g;7a&2vkgiF*El

So all in all, this was a pretty shameful day for Washington.

xLo6ik9szOCeH


AH^yO=lQqF&I1U4l

But this effort is not over. I want to make it clear to the American people we can still bring about meaningful changes that reduce gun violence, so long as the American people don’t give up on it. Even without Congress, my administration will keep doing everything it can to protect more of our communities. We’re going to address the barriers that prevent states from participating in the existing background check system. We’re going to give law enforcement more information about lost and stolen guns so it can do its job. We’re going to help to put in place emergency plans to protect our children in their schools.

A*pG7KOy.i


d~FOoq3+lnJM@wb#7f6

But we can do more if Congress gets its act together. And if this Congress refuses to listen to the American people and pass common-sense gun legislation, then the real impact is going to have to come from the voters.

Q_xc,;!x;1n


~#Y60!,v5H,

To all the people who supported this legislation -- law enforcement and responsible gun owners, Democrats and Republicans, urban moms, rural hunters, whoever you are -- you need to let your representatives in Congress know that you are disappointed, and that if they don’t act this time, you will remember come election time.

+0R1oW9-PG8OE)2B)pM


9qVi8TNchM1bVRc1

To the wide majority of NRA households who supported this legislation, you need to let your leadership and lobbyists in Washington know they didn’t represent your views on this one.

k=.~4Nl_OW!-ox


P0kX#()2A[

The point is those who care deeply about preventing more and more gun violence will have to be as passionate, and as organized, and as vocal as those who blocked these common-sense steps to help keep our kids safe. Ultimately, you outnumber those who argued the other way. But they're better organized. They're better financed. They’ve been at it longer. And they make sure to stay focused on this one issue during election time. And that's the reason why you can have something that 90 percent of Americans support and you can't get it through the Senate or the House of Representatives.

cIod_J9]qcF


5an&5Mj7htr-cf%d

So to change Washington, you, the American people, are going to have to sustain some passion about this. And when necessary, you’ve got to send the right people to Washington. And that requires strength, and it requires persistence.

Vq@jP=be53EgI6lS


8W=r@dU09&p_1

And that's the one thing that these families should have inspired in all of us. I still don't know how they have been able to muster up the strength to do what they’ve doing over the last several weeks, last several months.

NqY*=T,aY2O=JUgh4o-.


Wdp&lccec8@D^PzF

And I see this as just round one. When Newtown happened, I met with these families and I spoke to the community, and I said, something must be different right now. We’re going to have to change. That's what the whole country said. Everybody talked about how we were going to change something to make sure this didn't happen again, just like everybody talked about how we needed to do something after Aurora. Everybody talked about we needed change something after Tucson.

JkPdge(ww_Vq]q45


[p#3E|0mz=](BFxWa

And I’m assuming that the emotions that we’ve all felt since Newtown, the emotions that we’ve all felt since Tucson and Aurora and Chicago -- the pain we share with these families and families all across the country who’ve lost a loved one to gun violence -- I’m assuming that's not a temporary thing. I’m assuming our expressions of grief and our commitment to do something different to prevent these things from happening are not empty words.

_pzpVr12jq6o;=O~


9W8uc4m1E!yh_10hAy_!

I believe we’re going to be able to get this done. Sooner or later, we are going to get this right. The memories of these children demand it. And so do the American people.

-2Z1pW=+D_2f1w


4SsIz!Zr!(Jhn

Thank you very much, everybody.

.Vx1AxqdskQll&l


eoqG&~oM96ARnX0mz

END

n[-N4m*UH0G@@U8


60xDAfoJbNxaL%zdWh-)FG;L;P(Vd^ZTsXkps919jauSbLU
重點單詞   查看全部解釋    
relief [ri'li:f]

想一想再看

n. 減輕,解除,救濟(品), 安慰,浮雕,對比

聯想記憶
coherent [kəu'hiərənt]

想一想再看

adj. 合理的,一貫的,明了的,粘著的,相干的

聯想記憶
dealer ['di:lə]

想一想再看

n. 商人,經銷商,發牌者,毒品販子

 
funds

想一想再看

n. 基金;資金,現金(fund的復數) v. 提供資金

 
reconstruction [.ri:kən'strʌkʃən]

想一想再看

n. 復興,改造,再建

 
moderation [.mɔdə'reiʃən]

想一想再看

n. 緩和,適度,節制

 
restore [ri'stɔ:]

想一想再看

vt. 恢復,修復,使復原

 
supply [sə'plai]

想一想再看

n. 補給,供給,供應,貯備
vt. 補給,供

聯想記憶
timely ['taimli]

想一想再看

adj. 及時的,適時的
adv. 及時的

聯想記憶
isolated ['aisəleitid]

想一想再看

adj. 分離的,孤立的

 
?
發布評論我來說2句

    最新文章

    可可英語官方微信(微信號:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英語學習資料.

    添加方式1.掃描上方可可官方微信二維碼。
    添加方式2.搜索微信號ikekenet添加即可。
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 美女绳奴隶| 乱世危情电视剧演员表| 爱情岛视频论坛| 延边卫视节目表今天| 文王一支笔的功效与作用| 许多组织都有自己的价值标准和行为理念| 啊摇篮电影| 乔治桑| 九九九九九九九伊人| 汪汪队之小砾与工程家族| 蜡笔小新日语| 古今大战秦俑情电影| 何昊阳| 天天快乐视频免费观看下载| 真命小和尚电视剧| 黄金太阳2| 爱奴 电影| 韩国电影《无尽猎罪》的导演是谁| 首映式| 贤惠好儿媳在线观看完整版| 男生强吻女生视频| https://www.douyin.com/| 纵横欲海| 和平饭店电视剧42集免费观看| 少女模特电影| 三年级下册语文第五单元作文奇妙的想象| ,xx| 打手板心视频80下| 诺亚方舟电影免费完整版在线观看| 蔡宜达的老婆吴佩柔照片| 成人的性行为免费| 冠希哥| juliet stevenson| 张志忠演员| 爱情三选一| 挠tk| 大内群英 电视剧| 装饰色彩| 报团云南旅游价格| 澳亚卫视| 李洋个人资料照片|