評(píng)論
打印
Organic food options are often a pretty penny more than their conventionally produced counterparts. And they have often been touted as better for you as well as the environment.
選擇有機(jī)食品往往比傳統(tǒng)方式生產(chǎn)的食品花錢更多。然而有機(jī)食品常被人們追捧成對(duì)自身和環(huán)境均有益的食品。
But if you're looking for extra nutrients you might not be getting them, according to a new review paper in Annals of Internal Medicine.
據(jù)一篇發(fā)表在《內(nèi)科學(xué)年鑒》上的新調(diào)查所說(shuō)，當(dāng)你知道自己攝取的營(yíng)養(yǎng)過(guò)剩，你就不會(huì)選擇它們了。
Researchers analyzed results from 237 strong studies looking for health differences between the two types of food—and didn't find much.
為了找出這兩種食品在健康方面的差異，研究人員共分析了237個(gè)權(quán)威的調(diào)查結(jié)果。
Only 17 of the studies were in humans, and they did not include any long-term follow-ups of their subjects.
其中只有17項(xiàng)研究適用于人類，且這些研究不對(duì)調(diào)查對(duì)象進(jìn)行長(zhǎng)期的隨訪。
One study did find that children on an organic diet had smaller traces of pesticides in their bodies. And although pesticide amounts were below current acceptable U.S. levels, many health experts contest that pesticide exposure limits are still too high.
還有一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，在一個(gè)有有機(jī)食品飲食習(xí)慣的兒童體內(nèi)殘留有殺蟲(chóng)劑。殺蟲(chóng)劑殘留成分低于目前美國(guó)可接受標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，不過(guò)許多健康專家抗議殺蟲(chóng)劑殘留限度仍然過(guò)高。
Organic methods might also cut down on antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
有機(jī)食品還有可能降低抗藥性細(xì)菌的數(shù)量。
So going organic might be more a personal choice about supporting that form of farming than about specific health benefits. And the most important health choice, it seems, is to stop dallying over produce labels and just eat it—at least five servings a day.
與其說(shuō)走向有機(jī)化有益于身體健康，還不如說(shuō)是個(gè)人為支持這種生產(chǎn)方式所做出的選擇。最重要的健康選擇，似乎不應(yīng)在生產(chǎn)標(biāo)簽上磨嘰。盡管去吃有機(jī)食品吧，不過(guò)一天至少5份。
原文譯文屬可可原創(chuàng)，未經(jīng)允許請(qǐng)勿轉(zhuǎn)載！
