評(píng)論
打印
It's a controversial conclusion, throwing doubt over evidence gathered from people held in sensory deprivation.
這個(gè)結(jié)論引起了巨大爭(zhēng)議，使公眾開(kāi)始懷疑從感官剝奪囚犯那里收集到的證據(jù)真實(shí)性。
I think it's very important, this increase in suggestibility when exposed to sensory deprivation,
我認(rèn)為這很重要，即感官剝奪造成接受暗示傾向增強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)象，
because in many parts of the world people are held in situations of sensory deprivation.
因?yàn)樵谑澜绾芏嗟胤剑藗兌继幱诟泄賱儕Z的狀態(tài)當(dāng)中。
That means that the evidence that is accumulated in those places must be considered very unreliable
這意味著在這些地方收集到的證據(jù)都應(yīng)被認(rèn)為是不可靠的，
because people will, after a while, start to take on board the views of their interrogators.
因?yàn)槿藗兘?jīng)過(guò)一段時(shí)間后，會(huì)最終接受審問(wèn)者強(qiáng)加給他們的觀點(diǎn)。
Overall, the tests show for the first time the critical impact of such conditions on the functioning of the central executive.
總之，這些測(cè)試首次揭示了感官剝奪對(duì)中央控制系統(tǒng)的決定性影響。
We see a reduction in the speed of information processing.
我們檢測(cè)到了信息處理速度的降低。
We see a reduction in ability to abstract and verbal fluency.
抽象能力和口頭表達(dá)能力的下降。
And we see an increase in suggestibility.
我們還看到了易受暗示水平的升高。
All those would suggest a deterioration in the functioning of the central executive.
這些結(jié)果都意味著中央控制系統(tǒng)的功能出現(xiàn)了惡化。
