評論
打印
Think about having surgery.
比如做手術。
Your doctor has to make sure that you are meaningfully and knowingly consenting to that medical procedure.
醫生需要確認你了解并同意醫療程序。
This is not the type of consent like with an iTunes Terms of Service
這可不像你同意iTunes服務條款一樣，
where you just scroll to the bottom and you're like, agree, agree, whatever.
直接滑到屏幕底部，然后一個勁地點同意。
If we think more about consent, we can have better privacy laws.
如果我們多考慮他人是否同意，我們會有更好隱私法。
Right now, we just don't have that many protections.
現在，我們沒有那么多的保護。
If your ex-husband or your ex-wife is a terrible person, they can take your nude photos and upload them to a porn site.
如果你的前夫或前妻為人很不好，他們可以把你的裸照發到色情網站上去。
It can be really hard to get those images taken down.
想把那些照片刪掉是很難的。
And in a lot of states, you're actually better off if you took the images of yourself because then you can file a copyright claim.
在許多州，你自己拍照其實會更好點，因為這樣你就可以申請版權了。
Right now, if someone violates your privacy, whether that's an individual or a company or the NSA,
現在，如果再有人侵犯了你的隱私，不管是個人還是企業還是美國國安局，
you can try filing a lawsuit, though you may not be successful because many courts assume that digital privacy is just impossible.
你都可以提起訴訟，盡管訴訟結果可能并不成功，因為很多法院覺得保護數字信息隱私是不可能的。
So they're not willing to punish anyone for violating it.
所以他們不愿意去懲罰那些觸犯的人。
I still hear people asking me all the time,
我還是能聽到人們不停的問我，
isn't a digital image somehow blurring the line between public and private because it's digital, right?
數字圖像模糊了公共和私人的界限，因為它是數字的，對嗎？
No! No! Everything digital is not just automatically public. That doesn't make any sense.
不！不！每一個數位化產品并不是自然而然就成為公眾的。那太沒道理了。
