評論
打印
Daschuitzs may hope to terminate that practice by forcing torture to go public.
Dershowitz可能希望通過將酷刑公開化來結(jié)束
But why would stakes that covertly violated torture ban observe a warrant requirement?
這種行為但是那些秘密違反酷刑禁令的人又怎么會
The Bush administration has focused not on ticking bomb justifications but on what counts as torture.
遵守這樣的授權(quán)要求呢布什政府沒有聚焦于定時炸彈的辯護而是
Arguing that the new coercive interrogations are merely cruel, inhuman or degrading and so should not count.
關(guān)注什么是酷刑他們提出新的強制審問不過是比較殘忍不人道或者可恥的不能算酷刑
Yet at stake is ultimately the justificational issue.
但是最緊要的還是酷刑的辯護問題
Are the new methods which depart from historical paradigms like this torpedo enough like the old methods that reasons to them torture applied to both.
這些新型的審訊方法雖然不同于過去的一些審訊方法是不是酷刑
Are they comparably evil?
是不是同等的罪惡
The definitional challenge and the more direct justificational challenge to torture in today's debate, correspond to the two main elements of an evil on my analysis.
在如今的爭論中對于酷刑的定義以及為酷刑辯護正和我對罪惡的分析相一致
President Bush's definitional challenge disputes the idea that his harsh interrogation is intolerably harmful and so withholds the term torture.
布什總統(tǒng)對于定義提出質(zhì)疑認(rèn)為他的嚴(yán)厲審問手段并沒有造成不可忍受的傷害因此不屬于酷刑
In the purely subjective sense, torture is meant to be intolerable.
在純粹主觀的看法中酷刑應(yīng)當(dāng)是無法忍受的
It's in the normative sense, when a decent life or death cannot tolerate.
在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的意義上也就是指一個人不能忍受的時候
That the definitional challenge disputes the intolerable harmfulness of torture.
這個對于定義的質(zhì)疑也就將酷刑的不可忍受的傷害置于爭論中
The more direct justificational challenge is that of Bentham, Walshaw and Dashuitz.
而Bentham Walshaw和 Dershowitz則對酷刑辯護提出了質(zhì)疑
It disputes either that an open policy of torture is inexcusably wrong or that a policy of defying torture bans in extreme circumstances is or it offers a scenario suggesting possible excuses.
他們爭論道要么酷刑的公開政策是不可原諒地錯要么在極端情況下對抗酷刑禁令的政策是不可原諒的錯要么就是提供了一種情景設(shè)置
