評(píng)論
打印
What check we might ask is there on courts in a population told their lives were made more secure by torture?
當(dāng)一些民眾被告知他們的生活由于酷刑變得更安全時(shí) 對(duì)法庭有什么核查嗎
Would they have access to information adequate to evaluate such decisions given the practice of classified information?
民眾可以得到足夠的信息評(píng)估這樣的決策是否正確吧 但其實(shí)這種信息是保密級(jí)別的
How would they judge whether interreges were correctly identified?
他們要怎樣判斷受審者是正確識(shí)別出來的
What would prevent judges from retrospectively authorizing torture whenever official said,' security required here?
當(dāng)警官稱這里需要安全保障的時(shí)候 有什么能阻止法官在事后授權(quán)酷刑呢
Even if courts had access to classified information, how could a public lacking such access be justified in trusting them?
即便法庭可以看到保密信息不能看到信息的民眾又有什么理由相信他們呢
If there were much chance that a court would not remit most of the penalty, surely the current clandestine practice would continue.
如果法庭很有可能不會(huì)恕免大多數(shù)刑罰那么當(dāng)前這種秘密進(jìn)行的酷刑當(dāng)然還會(huì)繼續(xù)
This misnamed one off solution is no alternative to a torture culture.
這種一次性的解決辦法對(duì)于酷刑文化
Interrogators who will be basically forgiven need torture training schools.
而言并不是什么替代方案要從根本上原諒審訊者需要酷刑訓(xùn)練學(xué)校
Two, Daschuitzs is right to be concerned about clandestine torture.
第二點(diǎn)Dershowitz關(guān)注秘密酷刑
Even if useful information is extracted, interrogees are vulnerable to be pumped and dumped than is murdered.
是正確的即便這樣做得出了有用信息受審者經(jīng)受這樣的折磨要比被謀殺更脆弱
As McCoy reports that they were in the CIAs phoenix project in Vietnam.
McCoy報(bào)告說他們?cè)谥星榫值脑侥哮P凰計(jì)劃中
Information obtained by torture cannot be used for legal conviction yet victims may appear too dangerous if only to their torturers to release.
通過酷刑獲得的信息不能用于法律定罪但是如果對(duì)于虐待者來說將他們釋放又太危險(xiǎn)了
Just as rape victims are vulnerable to being murdered to eliminate the only witness,even interreges who reveal nothing may be eliminated to keep them silent about the torture.
就像脆弱的強(qiáng)奸受害者作為唯一的目擊證人會(huì)被謀殺以消除證據(jù)那些什么也沒有交代的受審者也可能被滅口以掩蓋酷刑的行徑
