評論
打印
It is doubtful that torture can be confined to extreme situation and not become routine.
我們無法確定酷刑可以局限于極端情況下而不會變成一種例行程序
McCoy sites evidence that to get useful information it is usually necessary to torture many most of whom will not or cannot reveal anything very useful.
McCoy援引證據(jù)提出要得到有用的信息我們通常有必要酷刑很多人其中大多數(shù)不會或者不能提供什么有用的信息
If so the hope of being able to confine torture to a few extreme cases is unrealistic.
如果果真如此那么想要將酷刑限定在
In general, it is not predictable who has truly vital information and who will break.
一些極端的案例下就是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的一般而言我們無法預(yù)測誰有真正關(guān)鍵的信息
The broken say anything incriminating the innocent including themselves,
誰會屈從讓步那些屈服的人會說出任何歸罪于包括他們自己在內(nèi)的無辜者的信息
whereas the strong prepare to die making torture in those cases unreliable or worse than useless.
而意志堅(jiān)強(qiáng)的人寧死不屈使得酷刑變得不可靠無意義
McCoy says, and this has been mentioned by other speaker that FBI interrogators claim, persuasion and gaining trust
剛剛其他的發(fā)言者也講到 McCoy指出FBI的審問員稱說服嫌疑人贏得他們的
and confidence are far more effective methods to gain truly useful intelligence, though those methods have their own problems.
信任和信心要遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)有效得多能夠得到真正有用的情報(bào)當(dāng)然這些方法也有各自的缺陷
Dashuitz is not the utilitarian many think him.
Dershowitz并不是許多人所認(rèn)為的功利主義者
That misperception is based on his lively presentation of the utilitarian case for torture
這種誤解來自于他對于酷刑的功利主義案例的生動描述
and of the likely hood from informal pose that ticking bomb torture would get popular support on utilitarian grounds.
以及定時(shí)炸彈酷刑在功利主義基礎(chǔ)上會得到大眾支持的
His hope seems to be that by instituting torture we could secure procedural justice and accountability
可能性比率的表述他希望通過規(guī)范化酷刑我們可以保障程序上的公正問責(zé)
but interrogation torture is procedurally a moral disaster.
但是酷刑在程序上就是一個(gè)道德災(zāi)難
The problem is not preemption, preemptive interventions can be justifiable, Dashuitz has an interesting book on that too.
問題并不在于搶先干預(yù)搶先干預(yù)可以是有正當(dāng)理由的
The procedural problem is that although torture is more severe than criminal punishments, interreges have not been found by tolerable standards of evidence, guilty of anything.
Dershowitz對此也寫了一本有意思的書過程的問題是盡管酷刑比刑罰處罰要更為嚴(yán)重酷刑者并沒有足夠的證據(jù)證明有過錯(cuò)
