Statutory provision is the USA Patriot Act combined with the United States Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction also known as the SMTJ.
其他法律上的支持是美國愛國者法案還有美國特別海域領(lǐng)土管轄權(quán)也被稱為SMTJ
Which has historically allowed for prosecution of crimes committed abroad, in places controlled by the United States such as military bases, things along.
在歷史上一貫允許對發(fā)生在美國境外的犯罪行為進行制裁 還有在美軍控制的地區(qū)比如軍事基地 以及周邊地區(qū)
Those lines The patriot act expanded the SMTJ to include any buildings of land used by the US government irrespective of ownership MEJA now.
愛國者法案將SMTJ包括的范圍擴大為無論所有權(quán)只要美國政府使用過的建筑都算在內(nèi) MEJA適用范圍
Appears to have a broader application than the SMTJ or the patriot act but the SMTJ was used for the only prosecution to date of a contractor for violence.
似乎比SMTJ或者愛國者法案更廣 但是迄今SMTJ只被用于一位工作人員對外國
Against a foreign national That was David Pizarro who was a CIA contracted who was sentenced to more than 8 years in prison for beating an Afghan detainee.
人施加暴力的行為 那個案子是一位中情局的雇員David Pizarro 他在2003年用手電筒把一位阿富汗被拘留者打死了
To death with a flashlight over a two day period in 2003 So I want to discuss as I said, Pizarro was the only prosecution so far since the beginning of this.
被判處了八年以上的監(jiān)禁所以他是自從美國占領(lǐng)阿富汗
And the Afghanistan that has taken place I want to discuss some of the notable prosecutions or would be prosecutions that have not taken place.
以來用這條法案懲罰的唯一的人接下來我想談談一些引起大家關(guān)注的判決還有不可能發(fā)生的判決
And i'll give some reasons why those might not have happened So perhaps the most striking most recent incident was the September 2007 Nisour.
我會給出我認為它們不可能發(fā)生的理由 最近發(fā)生也是最引人關(guān)注的可能是2007年9月的尼蘇爾