評論
打印
Congress, which of course Iraq and Afghanistan are not In 2006 Senator Lindsay Graham changed the language of the UCMJ to include.
軍事法庭 而伊拉克戰爭和阿富汗戰爭顯然不是 2006年LindsayGraham 對UCMJ的語言提出
Contingency operations so that it could be applied to Iraq and Afghanistan Graham's stated intent was to expand the extend the.
了質疑 這樣一來緊急軍事行動就可以被應用到伊拉克和阿富汗了Graham的目的是把UCMJ
UCMJ to contractors and in theory this change would do that but no civilian contractors have ever been charged under the UCMJ no.
擴展到所有合同人員 對法案做出的改變是可以實現這一想法的但是還沒有合同人員因為UCMJ
Discussion of changing the law ever took place, the military has never attempted to implement such changes and it's unclear again if it would.
而受到指控 從來沒有人討論過改寫法律軍方從來沒有想過實現這種變化而且它是否符合憲法
Ever pass constitutional muster However there does appear to be significant support for such a move from those in the military in.
還不明確 然而但是軍方對這樣的舉動非常支持 這樣做
Order to maintain the strong chain of command and enforce discipline For example westpoint law professor laid out the case for bringing.
有利于加強控制和管理 西點軍校的法學教授在談到把合同人員容納到
Contractors under the UCMJ arguing that quote "it's perhaps the first axiom of the law that like cases be treated alike, soldiers and civilians accused of like misconduct.
UCMJ下的時候說"這也許是第一條容許相似的案子得到相似處理的法律 犯同樣罪行
In alike wartime settings should not answer to different courts, different procedures and different law" However even if such an.
士兵和公民在戰爭背景下不會被移交給不同的法庭 不同的程序和不同的法律" 即使它是符合憲法的
Application were constitutional it is not clear that the UCMJ would cover contractors working for government.
UCMJ是否會包括除了軍事單位外的工作人員或者
Entities other than the military or whether it would cover those working for private corporate companies or foreign governments One more.
它的覆蓋面是否包括那些為私人公司或者外國政府工作的人員
