評論
打印
We were shocked. We had assumed that if millions of children were dying and they could be saved, the world would make it a priority to discover and deliver the medicines to save them. But it did not. For under a dollar, there were interventions that could save lives that just weren't being delivered.
我們震驚了。我們假設幾百萬兒童正在死亡線上掙扎，然而他們是可以挽救的，那么世界理應將運送藥物來拯救他們作為頭等大事。但是事實并非如此。由于沒有實施干預政策，那些價格還不到一美元的救命的藥劑，并沒有送到他們的手中。
If you believe that every life has equal value, it's revolting to learn that some lives are seen as worth saving and others are not. We said to ourselves: "This can't be true. But if it is true, it deserves to be the priority of our giving."
如果你相信生命都是平等的，那么當你發現某些生命被認為值得挽救，而另一些生命則不然，你會感到無法接受。我們對自己說：“事情不可能是這樣的。如果這是真的，那么它理應是我們努力的頭等大事。”
So we began our work in the same way anyone here would begin it. We asked: "How could the world let these children die?"
所以，我們用在座的任何人都會想到的方式開始工作。我們問：“這個世界怎么可以眼睜睜看著這些孩子死去？”
The answer is simple, and harsh. The market did not reward saving the lives of these children, and governments did not subsidize it. So the children died because their mothers and their fathers had no power in the market and no voice in the system.
答案很簡單，也很無情。在市場經濟中，拯救這些兒童是一項沒有利潤的工作，政府也不會提供補助。這些兒童之所以會死亡，是因為他們的父母在經濟上沒有實力，在這種政治體制中沒有發言權。
But you and I have both.
但是，你們和我在經濟上有實力，在政治上也有發言權。
We can make market forces work better for the poor if we can develop a more creative capitalism – if we can stretch the reach of market forces so that more people can make a profit, or at least make a living, serving people who are suffering from the great inequities. We can also press governments around the world to spend taxpayer money in ways that better reflect the values of the people who pay the taxes.
如果我們能夠設計出一種更有創新性的資本主義制度——如果我們可以改變市場，讓更多的人可以獲得利潤，或者至少可以維持生活，這就可以幫助那些正在極端不平等的狀況中受苦的人們，那么，我們就可以讓市場更好地為窮人服務。我們還可以向全世界的政府施壓，要求他們將納稅人的錢花到更體現納稅人價值的地方。
