評(píng)論
打印
Maybe l'd better go through the article again, just to be sure.
或許我我應(yīng)該再讀一遍那篇文章，好弄清楚到底怎么回事。
Can you remember what it was called?
你記得它的名字么？
Sample Surveys in Social Science Research',I think. By Mehta. M-E-H-T-A?
Mehta寫(xiě)的樣本調(diào)查和社會(huì)科學(xué)研究。M-E-H-T-A？
Yeah. And he also recommended a more recent book, called Survey Research by Bell, I think.
是的。我認(rèn)為他還推薦了一本更近代的書(shū)，是Belle寫(xiě)的《調(diào)查研究》。
It's in that series published by London University.
它是倫敦大學(xué)出版的藝術(shù)系列書(shū)籍。
And if we tried to use interviews instead,
如果我們?cè)囍迷L談法，
I saw a book in the departmental library that'll be helpful: it's called 'Interviews that work',by Wilson, published in Oxford in nineteen eighty-eight.
我在部門(mén)圖書(shū)館看了一本書(shū)，Wilson編寫(xiě)牛津1988年出版的《Interviews》，這會(huì)對(duì)我們非常有用。
Right. I've got a tutorial now. Can we meet up again later this week?
哦，我現(xiàn)在有一節(jié)指導(dǎo)課，要不這周晚些時(shí)候我們?cè)倥鲆淮蚊妫?/div>
What about Friday morning? Suits me. Eleven o'clock? Fine.
周五早上如何？好的，11點(diǎn)？好的。
Before Friday, I think we should all look through the reading list.
周五之前，我覺(jué)得我們應(yīng)該看完書(shū)單的所有內(nèi)容。
