In some countries, schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects, while in other countries, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particualar career. For today's world, which system is more appropriate? 一些國家，學校的教育學科廣泛；另一些國家，學校爭對不同的職業(yè)教授特定的課程。哪種教育方式更合適更好？

The importance of school education has been widely recognized throughtout the world. However, it raises concerns about what the functions schools should have. In some countries, schools only teach students pratical subjects and skills rather than other courses that have nothing to do with employment while in some other countries; students have more choices among a variety of subjects. From my perspective, the latter system is more to youngsters and sacrificing some of children's general subjects, such as music and sports, would be detrimental to their studies. 簡述引起爭議的現(xiàn)象，提出一些學校只教授特定的課程，而無視其他課程是對學生不利的。

Undoubtedly, those who support the former behavior, to some extent, may largely ignore the essence of education. In fact, not only should schools teach students professional skills that will potentially help them in their future career lives, but they also have to be responsible for students' physical and mental health, these subjects such as music, sports, drama and dance are extremly significant to those who are creative in these fields but not intelligent to study academic courses. In other words, if some children were not given right to take courses, they would lose their confidence and what's worse, they would think of schools as a hell and give up study as a consequence. Another point is that these subjects can help adolescents learn how to work in teams and compete with others, and then they would be able to communicate with others more effectively, which is an important part of their personal development. Moreover, some subjects like sports can also benefit youngsters a lot as it can make them energetic enough to complete their work and study. 一，除了學習學術課程，學生的身心健康更重要，所以音樂，體育，戲劇，舞蹈也有必要學習；二，如果剝奪學生學習某些課程的權利的話，有些學生會失去信心；三，有些貌似不重要的課程恰恰有助于培養(yǎng)青少年的個人品質，如團隊精神，溝通技巧。

Admittedly, the argument is not groundless that the small amount of subjects aim to contribute to students' employments should take a dominant role in schooling. Specifically, the first reason is that youngsters are more of less lacking a sense of discipline. In this case, if they were given opportunities to choose these subjects, it would lead to an irresponsible situation. Another reason is that due to the fierce competition in the labor market, students without skills will be ruled out easily. Thus, these practical subjects will at least make students earn a living in the rapidly changing world. But overall, in my opinion, students should not be taught to meet the demand of market at the expense of their freedom to study. 承認學習以就業(yè)和職業(yè)為導向的課程的必要性，可以讓學生在就業(yè)市場更具競爭優(yōu)勢。但中的來說，學生不應該以放棄自由學習為代價只學習某些特定的課程。

To conclude, I personally believe that schools do need to keep diversity of subjects, which is better for students' development. In addtion, teachers should make some effort to help youths to make right choices by offering professional suggestions. 總結：學校沒有必要為了學生設置專門的課程，而放棄一些課程。老師應該對學生的課程選擇給出專業(yè)性的建議。

（范文分析可可原創(chuàng)，轉載請注明出處。）