評論
打印
Biology and public policy might look irrelevant on the surface.
生物學和公共政策二者表面上看起來并不相關。
But in every decision that people make, no matter in negations or policy formation,neuroscience can always reveal,to a varying degree, that why men make these decision.
但是人們做出的每一個決定,不管是否定或政策的成形,通過神經學總是不同程度上可以揭示為什么人類會有如此決定。
This has made research into the relationship between neuroscience and global politics valuable.
這使得神經科學和全球政治間的研究具有非凡意義。
Dr Nicholas Wright is a neuroscientist and fellow at the Carnegie Centre.
尼古拉斯·賴特博士是神經學家及卡內基中心的研究員。
He uses his neuroscience training and insights into human decision-making to inform nuclear-security policy.
他用自己的神經學培訓及洞察力研究人類決策以告知核安全政策。
So in what way is neuroscience and global politics relevant to each other?
因此神經科學和全球政治在哪些方面有所關聯呢?
How can decision-making be explained through neuroscience?
決策如何通過神經科學進行詮釋?
譯文屬可可原創，僅供學習交流使用，未經許可請勿轉載
