評論
打印
This debate is not merely a moral abstraction, it is central to everyday life in Britain –
這次辯論不僅僅是一個(gè)道德上的抽象概念，它是英國人日常生活的核心，
from why the workforce is so unproductive to how your kids’ Sure Start centre got shut down.
從工人如此低效的原因，到你孩子的確保開端計(jì)劃中心關(guān)閉的方式。
As a case of rogue capitalism, Boots is sharply different and especially troubling.
作為流氓資本主義的一個(gè)例子，博姿藥妝的情況截然不同，尤其令人不安。
First, the online giants and investment banks that usually get blasted for bad behaviour by newspapers and select committees grew up in this new world of business.
首先，網(wǎng)絡(luò)巨頭和投資銀行的經(jīng)常因不良行為受到報(bào)紙和特別委員會的抨擊，它們在這個(gè)新的商業(yè)世界中成長起來。
Boots, on the other hand, traces its origins back to the Methodist Nottingham of the 1840s.
另一方面，博姿藥妝的起源可以追溯到19世紀(jì)40年代的諾丁漢衛(wèi)理公會。
It has gone through dramatic changes to end up in this bracket.
它經(jīng)歷了巨大的變化，最終達(dá)到了這個(gè)水平。
Second, where the likes of Sports Direct and Amazon are criticised for their treatment of low-paid temporary workers,
其次，動向體育和亞馬遜等公司因?qū)Υ托脚R時(shí)工的方式而受到批評，
Tony and his colleagues are professionals.
托尼和他的同事是專業(yè)人士。
Their testimony shows how even “good jobs” are changing.
他們的證詞表明，即使是“好工作”也在發(fā)生變化。
Finally, Britain relies on Boots – and Boots relies on Britons.
最終，英國依賴著博姿藥妝，而博姿藥妝則依賴著英國人。
It is by far the biggest pharmacy chain in the country.
它是目前英國最大的連鎖藥店。
Healthcare professionals refer to the firm as an “essential component” of the NHS.
醫(yī)療專業(yè)人士將該公司稱為英國國民健康保險(xiǎn)制度的“重要組成部分”。
It is to outpatient care what the high-street banks are to the UK’s money system:
它之于門診病人，就像商業(yè)銀行之于英國貨幣體系：
a massive private-sector firm delivering a vital public service.
提供重要公共服務(wù)的大型私營企業(yè)。
