評論
打印
Yeah, I mean, I think you're spot on, but that goes back to the incentives. Like,
是的，我覺得你講的正中要害，但這反過來回到了剛才所說的動機問題。
one of the choices we made in the early days was we had this number that showed how many people follow you.
在早期，我們設計的系統是這樣的：系統會顯示關注你賬號的人數。
We decided that number should be big and bold, and anything that's on the page that's big and bold has importance, and those are the things that you want to drive.
我們決定讓這個數字放大又加粗顯示，你界面上放大粗體的字體都很重要，這些就是你想推動的東西。
Was that the right decision at the time? Probably not. If I had to start the service again, I would not emphasize the follower count as much.
對當時而言，這是否是正確的做法呢？也許不是。如果讓我重頭來過，我不會再這么強調關注人數。
I would not emphasize the "like" count as much. I don't think I would even create "like" in the first place,
我不會再這么強調推文的“喜愛”數量。我甚至不覺得我會創造“喜愛”這個功能，
because it doesn't actually push what we believe now to be the most important thing, which is healthy contribution back to the network
因為這個功能并不能推動我們眼中最重要的事，對網絡提供健康的貢獻，
and conversation to the network, participation within conversation, learning something from the conversation.
促進交流，推動人們參與交流，在交流中學習。
Those are not things that we thought of 13 years ago, and we believe are extremely important right now. So
我們在13年前沒有考慮到這些，但現在我們卻認為它們非常重要。所以，
we have to look at how we display the follower count, how we display retweet count, how we display "likes," and just ask the deep question:
我們需要審視系統如何呈現粉絲數，呈現轉推數，呈現“喜愛”的數量，并且問這個深奧的問題：
Is this really the number that we want people to drive up? Is this the thing that, when you open Twitter,
我們想讓人們提升的是否就是這個數字？我們是否希望人們打開推特，
you see, "That's the thing I need to increase?" And I don't believe that's the case right now.
意識到，“這就是我要提升的東西？”我相信現在答案是否定的。
I think we should look at some of the tweets that are coming in from the audience as well.
我覺得我們也應該看看一部分來自聽眾的推文。
