評論
打印
The reason for this is the way we make decisions.
是我們做決定的方式導(dǎo)致的這種結(jié)果。
Judges have the best intentions when they make these decisions about risk, but they're making them subjectively.
法官懷著善意做出這些有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的決定，但，是主觀的決定。
They're like the baseball scouts 20 years ago who were using their instinct and their experience to try to decide what risk someone poses.
他們就像20年前的棒球偵查員，他們憑本能和經(jīng)驗(yàn)試著去判斷某個(gè)人制造的危險(xiǎn)。
They're being subjective, and we know what happens with subjective decision making, which is that we are often wrong.
他們是主觀的，我們知道主觀決策會導(dǎo)致什么，那就是我們常常犯錯(cuò)。
What we need in this space are strong data and analytics.
我們需要的是有力的數(shù)據(jù)和分析。
What I decided to look for was a strong data and analytic risk assessment tool,
我決定尋找一個(gè)有力的數(shù)據(jù)分析的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估工具，
something that would let judges actually understand with a scientific and objective way what the risk was that was posed by someone in front of them.
這個(gè)工具會讓法官以科學(xué)的客觀的方式去了解什么樣的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)擺在他們面前。
I looked all over the country, and I found that between five and 10 percent of all U.S. jurisdictions actually use any type of risk assessment tool,
我找遍了全國，發(fā)現(xiàn)5%至10%的美國管轄區(qū)域?qū)嶋H使用了某些類型的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估工具，
and when I looked at these tools, I quickly realized why.
我查看了這些評估工具之后，很快意識到其中緣由。
They were unbelievably expensive to administer, they were time-consuming,
它們應(yīng)用起來非常昂貴，非常耗時(shí)，
they were limited to the local jurisdiction in which they'd been created.
它們被限制在地方管轄區(qū)域，因?yàn)樗鼈兙统鲎阅抢铩?/div>
So basically, they couldn't be scaled or transferred to other places.
因此，基本上，它們不能擴(kuò)展或轉(zhuǎn)移到其他地方。
