評論
打印
Hoping to smooth things over, Polito herself e-mailed Neely on January 14, 2015, asking for their cover choice.
2015年1月14日，波利托給尼莉發了一封電子郵件，詢問她們的封面選擇，希望能順利解決這件事情。
Polito says she intended to waive the additional cost,
波利托說她打算放棄額外的費用，
but the couple still didn't make a selection.
但這對夫婦仍然沒有選擇封面。
In fact, on that very day, a reporter from NBC 5 was interviewing them.
事實上，就在那天，NBC 5的一名記者采訪了他們。
They had sent the station an e-mail with the subject line
他們給電視臺發了一封電子郵件，主題是：
"Help us get our wedding photos we paid for."
“幫我們得到花錢買的結婚照?！?/div>
The segment aired two days later.
這段視頻在兩天后播出。
It showed the Moldovans saying that
按照摩爾多瓦夫婦的說法，
Polito had "cheated" and "scammed" them and that she "blatantly stole money while holding [their] pictures ransom and then adding on extra fees."
波利托對他們進行了“欺詐”和“欺騙”，她“公然偷錢，拿著（他們的）照片勒索贖金，然后再增加額外費用。”
Several websites ran the story, and the Moldovans shared a link on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Neely's beauty and lifestyle blog.
幾家網站刊登了這篇報道，摩爾多瓦夫婦在Facebook、Instagram、Twitter和Neely的美麗生活博客上分享了這個鏈接。
The blowback got so bad that Polito took down her Facebook page.
后果很嚴重，以至于波利托刪掉了她在Facebook的頁面。
About two months later, on March 18, Polito filed a defamation suit against the Moldovans,
大約兩個月后，3月18日，波利托對摩爾多瓦夫婦提起誹謗訴訟，
claiming that they had "instituted a public smear campaign" intended to "harm" her business.
聲稱他們發起了一場“公眾誹謗運動”，意圖“損害”她的生意。
The couple argued that they were simply exercising their right to free speech and that the suit was an attempt to "silence and punish" them.
這對夫婦辯稱，他們只是在行使言論自由的權利，訴訟是在試圖“壓制和懲罰”他們。
