評論
打印
Voice 2: Lesley never found out what actually happened to Charles. She knows that people he trusted betrayed him. She also knows that he met with a terrible death. She met people who played a part in her husband's killing. But she cannot prove anything. So what purpose did the film serve? It did not bring about justice for Charles. No one has been punished for his death. Did Lesley just waste her time?
聲音2：萊斯莉沒有查明查爾斯遭遇了什么。她知道查爾斯信任的人背叛了他。她也知道查爾斯死得很慘。她見了在她丈夫遭謀殺一事上推波助瀾的人。但是她什么都沒能證明。那她拍攝這部影片的目的是什么？這部影片沒有為查爾斯伸張正義。沒有人為他的死亡受到懲罰。萊斯莉只是在浪費時間嗎？
Voice 1: Lesley is clear about her answer to this issue.
聲音1：萊斯莉對這個問題的答案很明確。
Voice 3: "The film is about a woman coming to terms with the death of her husband. It is about telling the story of Rwanda and its people. It is about finding hope. As a Christian I believe that this hope can be found through the love of Jesus Christ. In some small way this film helps people remember the past. But I also hope it will encourage people to build a new future. A future based on love, understanding and forgiveness."
聲音3：“這部影片講述了一個女人面對她丈夫已經死亡這個事實。影片講述了盧旺達及其公民的故事。同時，這部影片也在尋找希望。作為基督教徒，我相信這種希望能通過對耶穌的愛來實現。在某種程度上，這部影片幫助人們回憶過去。但是我也希望影片能鼓勵人們構建新的未來。一個以愛、理解和原諒為基礎的未來。”
譯文屬可可原創，僅供學習交流使用，未經許可請勿轉載
