評論
打印
There is a lot, these two men went against each other in 1952 and in 1956 again
當時有很多，這兩個候選人在1952年針鋒相對并在1956年再次角逐總統
and in 1952 Eisenhower just crushes Stevenson
在1952年艾森豪威爾徹底擊敗史蒂文森
I had a very interesting and intellectually oriented Democrat
我認為很有趣的是理智導向的民主黨
winning in the south again, winning big cities in the north-east
再一次獲得南部和東北部大城市的支持
but elsewhere in the country not doing very well at all against the amiable general
但與和藹可親的五星上將相比，他們在其他地區表現得并不好
and moderate which is something that I think is important to understand from today
溫和派，我認為從今天的角度去了解它是非常重要的
Here's a quote from Dwight D. Eisenhower, I'll read it out loud
下面一段話引自艾森豪威爾，我將大聲地朗讀
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security unemployment insurance
如果一個政黨試圖廢除社會保障和失業保險
and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, You would not hear of that party, again in our political history
取消勞工法和農業項目，它會消失在我們的政治史中
There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things
相反恰有一些小派別認為做這些事情是應該的
among them are H.L.Hunt...a few other Texas oil millionaires and an occasional politician or business man from other areas
他們之中有H.L.亨特……一些其他德州的石油大亨，以及還有一些政治家，或其他領域的商人
Their number is negligible and they are stupid
但他們的數量是微不足道的，他們是愚蠢的
I haven't actually verified this quote, it's from a Democratic website but that is certainly how this report it
我沒去驗證這段話的真實性，這段話摘自一個共和黨的網站，但它就是這么說的
Another interesting thing to look at is the Top Marginal Income Tax Rate
另一個值得注意的東西是最高邊際所得稅稅率
Alittle bit of history there
這里有些歷史數據
7% was the top rate when Wilson came in, it reached up to 77% in the war, war sure expensive
威爾森上任時，最高稅率是7%，在一戰的時候達到了77%，戰爭中的稅無疑會很高
in the conservative 1920s, it was pushed down to 25%
在保守的1920年代，它降到了25%
