評論
打印
There's a popular myth that Apple's iPad and other tablets are simply media-consumption devices, unsuitable for productivity applications. That's just not so, and this week I tested a variety of office suites for the iPad for mini-reviews of their capabilities. In fact, I wrote and edited this entire column on an iPad using the most popular paid iPad app, the $10 Pages word processor by Apple.
有個流行的說法，蘋果iPad和其他平板電腦只是媒體消費設備，而不適合用于辦公。事實并非如此，本周我測試了諸多iPad上的辦公組件，初步了解了它們的性能。實際上，這篇專欄文章我就是完全在iPad上撰寫和編輯的，用的是蘋果售價10美元（約合人民幣62元）的文字處理應用Pages。
Not every productivity task is optimally done on tablet software, of course. Writing a plain text document like this one isn't the same as creating a large, nuanced spreadsheet. For complex documents, I still recommend using a PC or Mac.
當然，并不是每項工作任務都適合在平板應用軟件上處理。撰寫這樣的純文本文檔不同于創(chuàng)建一個龐大繁細的表格。對于復雜的文檔，我還是推薦使用PC和Mac。
And then there's the problem with typing on a tablet's virtual keyboard. If you're going to use your iPad for longer documents, I suggest using a Bluetooth keyboard. I used a physical keyboard to write this, though I usually am fine with the on-screen one.
而且在平板電腦的虛擬鍵盤上輸入也是個問題。如果你打算用iPad輸入較長文件，我建議使用藍牙鍵盤。我是用的實體鍵盤寫得這篇稿子，雖然平時我會用屏幕上的鍵盤。
Despite these caveats, iPads and other tablets are being used every day for productivity tasks once reserved for laptops. Every time you reach for your iPad to read, or tap out, a work-related email, that's productivity. Every time you make or change a business appointment on an iPad calendar, that's productivity. And there are way too many tailored productivity and business apps to list here, including apps for salespeople, contractors and doctors.
盡管有這些注意事項，但我們每天都在用iPad和其他平板電腦處理過去曾經(jīng)是筆記本承擔的辦公任務。每次你用iPad閱讀或回復工作郵件時，這就是在辦公。每次你在iPad日程表上新建或更改商業(yè)會見時，這就是在辦公。而且平板電腦上還有為數(shù)眾多的專用辦公與商業(yè)應用，包括為銷售人員、承包商以及醫(yī)生打造的應用軟件。
There's a major gap, though: Microsoft Office. The software giant doesn't yet offer a tablet-optimized version. So there are iPad apps that attempt to emulate the features of Office and can import and export files in Microsoft's Office formats. They generally don't offer all of the features of Office and don't always offer perfect fidelity with PC and Mac versions of Office. But I have found they are fine for the basic documents most people create or edit. And all can open and edit Office-type files attached to email, using the iPad's 'Open In...' command. You just touch the attachment icon for a bit longer than usual and a grid of compatible apps to use for editing appears.
不過，微軟(Microsoft)的Office尚未推出針對平板優(yōu)化的版本，這是個很大的缺憾。因此，有一些iPad應用試圖模仿Office功能，可以以微軟Office格式導入導出文件。這些應用一般不能提供Office的全部功能，也不總是能與PC或Mac版Office完美兼容。但我覺得，這些應用可以滿足大多數(shù)人創(chuàng)建和編輯基本文檔的需求。通過iPad的“以…打開”指令，它們都可以打開和編輯郵件附件里的Office類型文件。你只需要比平時較長時間地按住附件圖標，就可以看到一系列可以用于編輯的兼容應用。
Here are my impressions of some of these apps, including AstralPad, from a three-person startup that launched a few months ago. I tested these by doing two things with each. First, I created an identical word-processing document, with text in various styles and a photo, and then exported it to Microsoft Word on a PC and Mac. Then I imported a 23-page PowerPoint file to see if it looked as it did on a PC and Mac.
以下是我對其中一些應用的感受，其中包括了一家三人創(chuàng)業(yè)公司在幾個月前推出的應用AstralPad。我對每個應用都進行了兩項測試。首先，我會創(chuàng)建一個完全一樣的文字處理文檔，用不同方式輸入文字并添加照片，隨后導出到PC和Mac上的微軟Word軟件。然后，我會導入一個23頁的PPT文件，看其在iPad的顯示是否與PC及Mac上的一樣。
iWork
iWork應用
Introduced by Apple at the iPad's launch in 2010, the touch-version of the company's office suite is now in its seventh revision. It's the most touch-friendly of the products I tested and the most transparent about cases where it's incompatible with Office. Apple even maintains a Web page disclosing incompatibilities. The suite consists of Pages, the Numbers spreadsheet and the Keynote presentation app, which are sold for $10 each.
2010年，蘋果在iPad上推出了觸摸版的iWork，如今這套辦公應用已經(jīng)是第七版了。這是我所評測過最適合觸摸操作的產(chǎn)品，也是在與Office不兼容方面做得最透明的產(chǎn)品。蘋果甚至依舊保留著一個網(wǎng)頁顯示不兼容之處。這套組件包括Pages、Numbers表格以及Keynote演示應用，每款應用售價都是10美元（約合人民幣62元）。
iWork synchronizes documents as you type them with its cloud-based iCloud service, which can be accessed from any Web browser and can export the files in Office formats. You can email documents in Office format. But unlike many other iPad apps, it lacks built-in access to popular online storage sites like Dropbox and Google Drive.
當你輸入文檔的時候，iWork應用會與基于云端的iCloud服務進行同步，而后可以在任何網(wǎng)頁瀏覽器上訪問，并可以以Office格式導出文件。你可以在電子郵件中用Office格式發(fā)送文檔。但不同于其他一些iPad應用，iWork沒有內置接入Dropbox和谷歌云端硬盤(Google Drive)這些熱門云存儲服務的功能。
The suite works well offline, as it stores documents locally as well.
這套組件可以把文檔存儲在本地，離線運行順暢。
Pages was fastest and easiest at creating my test document, but the document had a misaligned line when I viewed it in Word on a Mac and PC. On the other hand, Keynote on the iPad imported the presentation perfectly.
在創(chuàng)建我的測試文檔時，Pages用起來最為迅速便捷，但當我在Mac與PC上用Word查看文檔時，發(fā)現(xiàn)有一行沒有對齊。另一方面，Keynote在iPad上完美顯示了導入的演示文檔。
QuickOffice Pro HD
QuickOffice Pro HD應用
This Office substitute has been around a long time on various platforms and is fine for simple documents on the iPad. It costs $20 for all three modules in one app. It stores files locally and integrates with many popular cloud-storage services.
這一Office替代軟件已經(jīng)在各個平臺上發(fā)布了很久，適用于在iPad上處理簡單文檔。其售價20美元（約合人民幣124元），包括了所有三種格式。這款應用可以將文件存儲在本地，也整合了很多熱門的云存儲服務。
However, I couldn't insert the photo into my test document, and the presentation I imported was formatted wrong.
不過，這款應用不能在我的文本文檔中嵌入照片，我導入的演示文檔也顯示格式錯誤。
AstralPad
AstralPad應用
The newest competitor is merely a window into an office app running on a server. Since the server app is meant for PCs, it has many more features and in some cases, better fidelity, than apps that live on the iPad. It's free for now, but will soon cost a few dollars a month for more than a limited number of documents.
這個最新的同類應用只是一個窗口，由此進入在服務器上的辦公應用。由于服務器應用是為PC設計的，因此包含了更多的功能；某些情況下，這款應用比iPad上的同類產(chǎn)品都更完善。AstralPad目前是免費的，但很快就要設定每月文檔數(shù)量限額，超過的話每月要收費。
However, the cloud-based program Astral uses isn't even an actual version of Office, but an open-source clone. And because it's meant for a mouse, I found it difficult to manipulate, even though Astral has added some touch controls and a virtual mouse.
不過，Astral所用的基于云端的軟件并不是實際版的Office，而是一個開源的克隆版。而且這是為鼠標操作設計的，即便Astral加了一些觸控和虛擬鼠標，我還是覺得有點難以操作。
In addition, it converts files in the current Office document formats into older formats before you can work with the files.
此外，這款軟件可以在進行文件處理前，將文件從目前的Office文本格式轉化為此前較老版本的格式。
AstralPad has some nice features. It allows you to work with multiple documents simultaneously and to cut and paste between them. And it has video and audio calling for collaboration. It works with cloud-based services and local storage. But it can't work offline.
AstralPad有一些不錯的功能。它可以同時處理多個文檔，可進行相互間剪貼復制。而且這款應用還有視頻與音頻通話的協(xié)作功能，可以本地存儲，也兼容云端服務。但AstralPad不能離線使用。
It created my test file fine after the company fixed a bug that at first wouldn't allow me to import a photo. But it didn't display the presentation file correctly, with overlapping text and pictures.
開始使用時，這款應用不允許我導入照片，他們解決了這個問題后，我用AstralPad創(chuàng)建了測試文件。不過，它不能正確顯示演示文件，文字與圖片會重合。
I found AstralPad to be a work in progress.
我覺得AsrtalPad還是個半成品。
CloudOn
CloudOn 應用
Like AstralPad, this is just a window into a server and won't work offline. But it uses a real, remote copy of Microsoft Office and is free. It was able to create my test document fine and to display my test presentation properly. It also integrates with cloud-based storage. But while it was easier to use than AstralPad, I still found it clumsy to use its PC software on a touch tablet.
和AstralPad一樣，這也只是個連接服務器的窗口，不能離線使用。但其使用了真正的微軟Office遠程版本，而且是免費的。CloudOn很好地創(chuàng)建了我的測試文件，也正確顯示了我用來測試的演示文檔。它也整合了云存儲服務。不過，雖然這款應用比AstraPad操作簡便，我仍然覺得在觸摸屏的平板電腦上使用PC軟件有點笨拙。
Bottom line: None of these iPad office suites is perfect, but you can get basic work done on them that will translate to a computer with little or no effort.
結論：這些iPad辦公組件都不完美，但你可以在上面完成基本工作，而后把它們便捷地轉到電腦上。
