評論
打印
These days, nearly every movie that hits the multiplex is a modernized version of some previously existing feature film. (Hollywood may not call it a straight up remake, but that's not really their style.) But is the trend to rehash old films all that new? A closer look at history reveals... not really.
這些天,幾乎每一部轟動影院的電影都是一些先前已有的故事片的現代化版本。(好萊塢可能不會稱之為重拍，但這不是他們的風格。)但是這一趨勢勢必將所有的老電影都翻新？仔細看看歷史所揭示的…不一定的。
Since the drawn of cinema, producers have been going back to old ideas for inspiration, twisting the plots of movies into brand new ones. With major brands being repurposed time and time again (a move that's kept the horror genre alive for the past decade) and the window of time necessary to let the original stew dwindling (we're looking at you Spider-Man!), the remakes that flood theaters are obvious callbacks. The "remake" aspect is can even be part of the appeal — "See BLANK, now new and improved with 21st century technology!"
自從電影院產生，制片人一直在回到舊片尋找靈感，改編情節使其成為全新的電影。隨著主要名片一次又一次地翻拍(在過去十年里此舉一直使得恐怖題材鮮活如初)和所需的時間空隙讓原版的擔憂減少(我們在期盼著你，蜘蛛俠！)，那些涌入影院的翻拍是明顯的召喚。“翻拍”部分甚至可以成為部分的吸引力——“看看空白，現在21世紀的技術都是全新和改進的！”
That said, there are plenty of remakes that don't wear their source material on their sleeves. The reasons are a plenty: maybe their roots are half a century old, from overseas, or weren't terribly good to begin with. Knowing that it's time to embrace the "remake" in a positive light, Hollywood.com took a look back at some of the lesser known redos in a gallery we like to call...
那就是說,很多翻拍作品都不會全部遵循原來的劇本。原因很多：也許他們根植于半個世紀之前的歷史，來自海外，或不太好的開始。知道現在是時候以積極之態擁抱“翻拍之作”了，好萊塢網站在一個我們喜歡回憶的圖庫中回顧了一些不太知名的重拍作品……
