(范文分析可可原創,轉載請注明出處。)
Some people think that companies and individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up pollution that they have caused. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 有些人認為政府應該解決污染問題,有些人認為制造環境污染物的個人和公司有承擔起清理的責任。你的看法是什么?
Pollution, ranging from black smokes in major cities to Ozone layer in Antarctic ocean, has been presented to us. Its prevalence has also generated a controversial issue about who should pay for the debt as a result of it. It is argued by some that business and the general public should take responsibility instead of government. I personally agree with this statement for two reasons. 開篇亮出自己的觀點,認為導致環境污染的個人和組織有責任清理污染物,解決環境污染問題。
The cleaning up campaign will be more thorough if individuals and businesses pay those pollution bills. As research have indicated, the majority of pollutions in the world are produced by those profit-maximizing business and individual industrial liquid public. Therefore, it would be a sound lesson for them to memorize if they were asked to pay for the cleaning fees. More importantly, the underlying left over in the future. (正面說理)事實證明,如果制造出污染的個人和組織能夠負責解決污染的話,會讓污染得到全面而深入的解決。
Moreover, direct debit out of those enterprises and citizens' pocket would be more efficient in controlling their anti-environmental behaviour from economic viewpoint. As commonly recognized, the majority of government revenue is from the taxpayers including businesses and individual taxpayers, therefore the money paid to clean up pollution bills will be, in some senses, from those people. Nevertheless, government tax revenue can not be used only on this field, it is very likely that the amount of money being used on pollution control is well planned in the beginning stage of government budget planning, which may be fairly small. In comparison with direct payment from those business and individual stakeholders involved, the payment approach through government suffers from the downside which is promarily concerned about inadequate amount of money available to environmental control. (從反面論證)從經濟的角度看了,盡管個人和組織都納稅給政府,一定程度上說,政府有責任出面解決污染問題,但是個人和組織上繳給政府的稅收還有很多更需要的地方,用于解決環境污染問題的資金只是政府預算的很小一部分。政府用于解決清理污染物是有限的。
To sum up, in terms of above-mentioned causes, I strongly believe that more through and effective outcome will occur if individual businesses and citizens shoulder the responsiblity. 總結,如果個人和組織能夠付起由自身導致的環境污染問題,那么環境污染物的清理和環境污染的解決會更有效和全面。