評(píng)論
打印
Prompted at least somewhat by Lenin's no peace no war doctrine,
威爾遜至少在某種程度上受到了列寧的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)“沒(méi)有戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)就沒(méi)有和平”思想的激發(fā)
Wilson supported moderate treatment for the central powers if and when they surrendered.
贊成如果軸心國(guó)投降，則對(duì)其采取溫和對(duì)待的態(tài)度
His 14th point called for the creation of an international organization devoted to maintaining world peace, the future League of Nations.
他的十四點(diǎn)和平原則號(hào)召創(chuàng)建一個(gè)國(guó)際組織致力于維護(hù)世界和平，也就是后來(lái)的國(guó)際聯(lián)盟
There is some evidence that the hope of a moderate peace brought the central powers to the negotiation table sooner rather than later.
有證據(jù)表明穩(wěn)健和平的希望讓軸心國(guó)更早地坐到了談判桌上
When the armistice finally came on November 11th 1918, it was just taken for granted the 14 points would be the basis of a peace treaty.
1918年11月11日最終達(dá)成停戰(zhàn)協(xié)議時(shí)，人們想當(dāng)然地認(rèn)為十四點(diǎn)和平原則將成為和平協(xié)議的基礎(chǔ)
Yet when the treaty negotiations began in Versailles France, it turned out Britain and France wanted to punish Germany after all.
然后當(dāng)條約談判在法國(guó)凡爾賽開(kāi)始后，事實(shí)卻是，英國(guó)和法國(guó)還是想要嚴(yán)懲德國(guó)
The consequences of this Versailles Treaty would be dire indeed.
這個(gè)《凡爾賽條約》帶來(lái)的后果是糟糕透頂?shù)?/div>
Since the US Senate bogged at signing this clearly punitive treaty,
美國(guó)并沒(méi)有簽署這個(gè)明顯是懲罰性的條約
the US instead signed separate treaties with Germany and Germany's Allies.
而是與德國(guó)和德國(guó)的同盟國(guó)分別簽署了條約
The Senate also refused to enter the newly created League of Nations on Wilson's terms.
議會(huì)也拒絕在威爾遜的任期內(nèi)加入新創(chuàng)立的國(guó)際聯(lián)盟
Wilson rejected the Senate's compromise proposal, blocking America's entry into the League of Nations for good.
威爾遜拒絕了議會(huì)的折中提議，讓美國(guó)永遠(yuǎn)不加入國(guó)際聯(lián)盟
Deprived of American contributions the League was doomed to fail.
沒(méi)有了美國(guó)的參與，國(guó)際聯(lián)盟注定要失敗
