評(píng)論
打印
The New York Post reports that a judge is forcing Starbucks to keep 77 failing Teavana stores open
據(jù)《紐約郵報(bào)》報(bào)道，法官?gòu)?qiáng)制星巴克繼續(xù)經(jīng)營(yíng)77家經(jīng)營(yíng)不善的茶瓦納店，
in a ruling that has chilling implications for the entire retail industry.
該判決對(duì)整個(gè)零售業(yè)來(lái)說(shuō)有著可怕的影響。
In July, Starbucks said that it planned to close all 379 of its Teavana stores by the end of the year.
星巴克在七月份宣布計(jì)劃在年底關(guān)閉所有379家茶瓦納店。
The stores are primarily located in shopping malls.
這些茶飲店大都坐落于購(gòu)物商場(chǎng)。
Mall operator Simon Property Group responded by suing Starbucks.
對(duì)此，商場(chǎng)運(yùn)營(yíng)商西蒙地產(chǎn)集團(tuán)則把星巴克告上了法庭。
This in order to keep the company locked into its leases for the 77 Teavana stores that are located in its malls.
此舉就是為了讓星巴克繼續(xù)履行其租約，因?yàn)樾前涂擞?7家茶瓦納店位于它的商場(chǎng)內(nèi)。
Simon argued that the closure of Teavana stores could trigger additional store closures in its malls.
西蒙公司認(rèn)為茶瓦納店的關(guān)張可能引發(fā)其商場(chǎng)內(nèi)其他店面的關(guān)張。
譯文屬可可英語(yǔ)原創(chuàng)，未經(jīng)允許，不得轉(zhuǎn)載。
