評論
打印
Others claimed that it too closely resembled the 1963 “March on Washington” led by Martin Luther King Jr.
其他人認為其名稱與1963年由馬丁·路德金教授領導的“華盛頓游行”極其相似。
The event’s Facebook page is rife with comments advising white women to “check their privilege”.
在臉書帖上充滿了建議白人女性“確認自己的特權”的評論。
Some women, put off by all the bickering, decided not to attend.
有些女性，不相信這些爭論，決定不參與游行。
It is the kind of semantic nitpicking that has made progressive movements unappealing to many Americans.
這是一種語義上的“挑刺”，使得進步的運動失去了對許多美國人的吸引力。
Yet it may have done some good: the march has brought together a broad coalition.
雖然這也能帶來一些好處：游行已經結成了更加廣泛的聯盟。
Nearly 450 organisations, from the Council on American Islamic Relations to Greenpeace and the Coalition Against Gun Violence, have signed on as official partners.
從美國伊斯蘭關系委員會到綠色和平組織以及反對槍支暴力聯合會的將近450個組織已經簽署成為正式的伙伴。
In addition to well-trodden feminist concerns like the wage gap and paid parental leave, the protest platform embraces other causes—immigrant rights, ending police brutality, climate protection—as integral to women’s progress.
抗議的平臺除了討論一些老生常談的女權主義問題，如工資差距、帶薪產假以外，還囊括了其他問題——移民權利、終結警察暴力、氣候保護，使其成為女性進步不可或缺的因素。
The organisers argue that matters of social justice and women’s rights go hand in hand.
組織者們認為社會公正與女性權利是相輔相成的。
In the comfortable Obama years, many liberal Americans believed feminism’s work was mostly finished.
奧巴馬在位的美好時光里，許多自由主義的美國人認為女權主義的事業近乎完成。
Mr Trump’s ascent banished such complacency.
特朗普先生的上位摧毀了他們的自滿情緒。
He may be the unifying enemy they need.
特朗普可能會成為他們統一的敵人。
譯文來源考研英語時事閱讀
