評論
打印
Beneath their personal rivalry--and occasional grudging respect--was their basic philosophical difference.
在兩人的爭執(zhí)以及偶爾不情愿地表示出的尊重背后，是基本理念上的差異。
Jobs believed in an end-to-end integration of hardware and software,
喬布斯看好硬件和軟件集成的端到端一體化系統(tǒng)，
which led him to build a machine that was not compatible with others.
這就致使他要?jiǎng)?chuàng)造出與其他軟件和機(jī)器都不兼容的計(jì)算機(jī)。
Gates believed in, and profited from, a world in which different companies made machines that were compatible with one another;
蓋茨推崇不同的公司做出互相兼容的機(jī)器，自己從中獲利，
their hardware ran a standard operating system (Microsoft's Windows)
這些硬件設(shè)備都運(yùn)行同一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的操作系統(tǒng)--微軟的Windows操作系統(tǒng)，
and could all use the same software apps (such as Microsoft's Word and Excel).
并都能運(yùn)行同樣的軟件應(yīng)用程序，如微軟的Word和Excel。
"His product comes with an interesting feature called incompatibility," Gates told the Washington Post.
“他的產(chǎn)品有一個(gè)有趣的特點(diǎn)，就是不兼容性，”蓋茨告訴《華盛頓郵報(bào)》說，
"It doesn't run any of the existing software. It's a super-nice computer.
“它不運(yùn)行任何已有的軟件。它是一臺(tái)超級棒的電腦。
I don't think if I went out to design an incompatible computer I would have done as well as he did."
如果要我來設(shè)計(jì)一款不兼容的計(jì)算機(jī)，我覺得自己做不到他那么好。”
