【電影簡介】

影片將年代背景設定在地球生態已經遭到嚴重破壞、不適宜人類生存的未來時空。圍繞兩條主線展開，一是朱迪·福斯特飾演的暴政官員，她正勾結空間系統開發商，通過極樂空間的重啟程序發動一場奪權政變；另一線是馬特·達蒙飾演的受輻射且只剩五天生命的工人Max，他希望通過幫蛇頭綁架富商獲得偷渡極樂世界治療的船票從而醫治疾病；Max們則意外截取了極樂空間重啟的程序密鑰，由此上演了一場陰謀的剿殺與生存的抗禮。

【音頻文本】

They say "you can't teach an OLD dog new tricks", but at the tender age of 33, director Neil Blomkamp is already projecting old age into his new film "Elysium".

Blomkamp's 2009 movie "District 9" concludes with the aliens promising to return in three years. Four years later, the South African-Canadian director returns with "Elysium", older, but none the wiser. Like "District 9", "Elysium" is full of political messages, highlighting the conflict between the haves and have-nots. The only difference is, the previous film was centered on immigration, the new one on medical care.

In Blomkamp's dystopic vision of the year 2154, humans are divided between the rich and the poor. The poorstruggle with insufficient resources and unemployment on earth while the rich live comfortably on a space station called Elysium where sickness is eradicated with the help of super-effective medical devices. MattDamon is a former car thief and menial worker at an assembly line. He is exposed to a lethal dose of radiation at work and his only chance at survival lies in the medical devices on Elysium. He has no idea that his attempt to reach Elysium could cause the whole system to crumble.

Blomkamp's insight or skills only allows him to describe things as they are. In the guise of science-fiction, he vividly depicted the fate of immigrants in "District 9"; the pictures were largely filmed in South Africa. Similarly, "Elysium" is mostly photographed on the poor outskirts of Mexico City. Both films painted a striking picture of deprived groups, but neither venture deeper to disclose the root of the problem. Most notably, no explanation is given on the concentration of medical resources on Elysium. Is the disparity a result of the constant exploitation of the poor on the part of the rich? Or is the poverty on earth the result of pure negligence? In both films the director is satisfied with describing the world as he conceives it.

On the other hand, both films provide unsatisfactory endings. The aliens never returned in "District 9" and the lead character never recovered from trans-human mutation. "Elysium" simply ends with a revolution, during which the super-effective medical service is made available to all people. Revolutions can be difficult and a good story for a movie, but what follows is even more difficult. When you conceive a world wheremedical resources are controlled by the rich, you would naturally assume the situation is caused exactly by a shortage of such resources. If so, the act of making it available to all is hardly the end of the problem. However, our dear director seems Okay with the unrealistic, if not naïve, ending.

Neil Blomkamp was able to attract a lot of attention for the sarcasm and political message in his previousfilm, but if he learns no new tricks to broaden his reach, his audience will soon grow tired and go away. On a scale from one to ten, I give Elysium a five.

輕松調頻EZFM 微信mrweekly