評論
打印
Science is losing out because of the mistaken belief that "men are from Mars and women from Venus", a leading neuroscientist has claimed.
來自英國阿斯頓大學(xué)的里彭教授說，由于被“男人來自火星，女人來自金星”的信仰所誤導(dǎo)，科學(xué)正蒙受損失。
Professor Gina Rippon said it was time to debunk the myth that gender differences are hard-wired into our brains.
吉娜·里彭（Gina Rippon）教授說，是時(shí)候揭穿性別差異在我們大腦根深蒂固的神話了。
In reality, there was no significant difference between the brains of a girl and boy in terms of their structure and function, she stressed.
她強(qiáng)調(diào)，事實(shí)上從大腦的結(jié)構(gòu)和功能上看，男生和女生并無明顯差別。
But experiences and even attitudes could change the "plastic" brain on a physical level, causing its wiring to alter.
但經(jīng)歷甚至態(tài)度能在物理等級上改變“可塑造的”大腦，引起它的結(jié)構(gòu)變化。
It was this that led girls and boys from an early age to head in different directions, said Prof Rippon, from Aston University.
這就是導(dǎo)致男女生從早期開始向不同方向發(fā)展的因素，來自英國阿斯頓大學(xué)的教授Rippon說道。
While girls tended to gravitate towards fields of communication, people skills and the arts, boys were more likely to become scientists and engineers.
女孩傾向于人際關(guān)系技巧和藝術(shù)所吸引的時(shí)候，男孩更傾向于成為科學(xué)家和工程師。
Even when girls went into science, they mostly chose careers at the "softer" end of the subject, such as biology, psychology and sociology, rather than physics and maths.
即便女生進(jìn)入科學(xué)領(lǐng)域，她們更多選擇類似生物、心理學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)這樣“較淺顯”的學(xué)科，而非數(shù)學(xué)或物理。
Speaking ahead of this year's British Science Festival, taking place at the University of Birmingham next week, Prof Rippon said: "We're stuck in the 19th century model of the 'vacuum packed' brain, the idea that we're born with a brain that gives us certain skills and behaviours.
今年的英國科技節(jié)將于下周在伯明翰大學(xué)舉辦，在此之前里彭教授說，“我們被19世紀(jì)‘真空包裝’的大腦模式所困，即我們在出生時(shí)大腦就有相應(yīng)的技能和行為。”
"The brain doesn't develop in a vacuum.
“大腦并非在真空之中發(fā)展。”
"What we now know is that the brain is much more affected by stereotypes in the environment and attitudes in the environment, and that doesn't just change behaviour, it changes the brain."
“我們現(xiàn)在知道的是，大腦更容易被環(huán)境中的固有陳規(guī)和態(tài)度影響，它們并沒有改變行為，而是改變了大腦。”
Last year, 5, 000 boys in the UK completed Level 3 engineering apprenticeships, but only 40 girls, Prof Rippon pointed out.
里彭教授指出，去年完成了英國3級工程師學(xué)徒制的男生多達(dá)5000名，但女生只有40名。
Boys taking physics A level also vastly outnumbered girls.
取得物理學(xué)高分的男生也比女生多得多。
But Prof Rippon insisted this was nothing to do with innate differences in the way the brains of girls and boys worked.
但里彭教授堅(jiān)稱這與男女生先天的大腦工作機(jī)制差異并無關(guān)系。
Rather, it was likely to be the result of their brains being altered by experience.
相反，它更像是大腦被經(jīng)歷所改變的結(jié)果。
One of the most often quoted examples of gender difference is spatial ability - the ability to understand the relationships between different objects in space.
舉一個(gè)屢見不鮮的例子，性別的差異體現(xiàn)在空間能力——一種理解空間中不同物體間關(guān)系的能力上。
Boys are said to be naturally more spatially gifted.
據(jù)說男生天生就在空間能力方面有才華。
But if girls aged six to eight are given the tile-matching puzzle game Tetris, their brain wiring changes and their spatial ability improves, Prof Rippon said.
但里彭教授說，若女生在6歲時(shí)能接觸俄羅斯方塊這樣的益智拼圖游戲，她們的大腦架構(gòu)將得到改變，她們的空間能力也會(huì)提高。
She added: “It's quite clear that spatial cognition is very much involved with experience, whether or not you have experience of manipulating objects as opposed to just observing them.
她還說：“很明顯空間認(rèn)知和經(jīng)歷是息息相關(guān)的，無論你是否有操控物體或僅僅是觀察它們的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。”
"This goes back to 'toys for boys'.
“這可以追溯到‘男孩的玩具’上。”
"From a very early age, boys have a lot more experience with manipulating objects."
“男孩子們從很小的時(shí)候，就富有操控物體的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。”
Research had shown that as women attained greater access to education and power, gender differences began to disappear.
研究表明隨著女生有更好的受教育和獲得權(quán)力的機(jī)會(huì)，性別差異正在消失。
Prof Rippon was also dismissive of evolutionary psychologists who claimed the way men and women thought was largely the result of natural selection.
里彭教授也很不屑理會(huì)那些演化心理學(xué)家，他們宣稱男性和女性思維大部分是自然選擇的結(jié)果。
"The idea that women like the colour pink because it made them better able to pick berries - it's nonsense, " she said.
“女性喜歡粉色是因?yàn)檫@讓她們更擅長挑選漿果，這種觀點(diǎn)簡直荒唐。”她說。
Ill-conceived attempts to "fix" the problem of girls not going into science were likely to backfire, Prof Rippon argued.
妄圖“修正”女生不去進(jìn)入科學(xué)界的嘗試看來即將破產(chǎn)，里彭教授辯稱。
One infamous example of this was the European Commission's Science Is A Girl Thing video released in 2012 which was swiftly dropped "because it was so awful".
這里有一個(gè)聲名狼藉的例子，2012年所發(fā)布的一個(gè)視頻——?dú)W洲委員會(huì)科學(xué)部是女人干的活，它很快就下線了，因?yàn)椤八娴暮茉愀狻！?/div>
"It showed girls in lab coats testing lipstick and giggling a lot, " Prof Rippon said.
“視頻里的女孩們穿著實(shí)驗(yàn)室的大衣測試口紅，咯咯笑個(gè)不停，”里彭教授說。
She added: "Science is something everybody should engage with.
她還說：“每個(gè)人都該接觸科學(xué)。”
"Let's not make science girly.
“別把科學(xué)變成少女。”
"Let's make science interesting to anyone."
“要讓每個(gè)人都對科學(xué)感興趣。”
