評論
打印
精聽建議：
先完整地把一條新聞聽一到三遍，爭取掌握大意。然后，一句一句精聽，力爭每句話都聽明白。一貫做自己，才有好成績。
In the laws of political economy, the alienation of the worker from his product is expressed as follow: the more the worker produces, the less he has to consume; the more value he creates, the more valueless, the more unworthy he becomes; the better formed is his product, the more deformed becomes the worker; the more civilized his product, the more brutalized becomes the worker and the more he becomes nature bondsman.
Political economy conceals the alienation inherent in labour by avoiding any mention of the evil effects of work on those who work. Thus, whereas labour produces miracles for the rich, for the worker it produces destitution. Labour produces palaces but for the workers, hovels. It produces beauty, but it cripples the worker. It replaces labour by machines, but how does it treat the worker? By throwing some workers back into a barbarous kind of work, and by turning the rest into machines. It produces intelligence, but for the worker, stupidity and cretinism.
勞動
政治經濟學原理對勞動者與自己生產的產品的異化有如下表述：工人產出的越多，消費能力就越小；創造的價值越多，自己就越不值錢，工人的價值就越低；產品的性能越好，工人受損害的程度就越大；產品的文明程度越高，工人就變得越沒有感情，越來越成為大自然的奴隸。
政治經濟學沒有提到工作對勞動者的有害影響，因而隱藏了勞動具有的內在的異化勞動者的本質特性。這樣，雖然勞動為富人創造了奇跡，卻給勞動者帶來了貧困。勞動建造了宮殿，勞動者卻住在簡陋小屋里。勞動產生了美麗，卻嚴重損害了勞動者。機器取代了人工勞動，那么勞動者受到了怎樣的待遇呢？一些勞動者被迫從事低級繁重的工作，其他的都變成了機器。勞動帶來了智慧，帶給勞動者的卻是愚昧和癡呆。
