日韩色综合-日韩色中色-日韩色在线-日韩色哟哟-国产ts在线视频-国产suv精品一区二区69

手機APP下載

您現(xiàn)在的位置: 首頁 > 雅思 > 雅思閱讀 > 雅思閱讀模擬題 > 正文

2012年雅思閱讀模擬試題(11)(附答案)

編輯:Rainbow ?  可可英語APP下載 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet

  Selling Digital Music without Copy-protection Makes Sense

  A. It was uncharacteristically low-key for the industry's greatest showman. But the essay published this week by Steve Jobs, the boss of Apple, on his firm's website under the unassuming title "Thoughts on Music" has nonetheless provoked a vigorous debate about the future of digital music, which Apple dominates with its iPod music-player and iTunes music-store. At issue is "digital rights management" (DRM)—the technology guarding downloaded music against theft. Since there is no common standard for DRM, it also has the side-effect that songs purchased for one type of music-player may not work on another. Apple's DRM system, called FairPlay, is the most widespread. So it came as a surprise when Mr. Jobs called for DRM for digital music to be abolished.

  B. This is a change of tack for Apple. It has come under fire from European regulators who claim that its refusal to license FairPlay to other firms has "locked in" customers. Since music from the iTunes store cannot be played on non-iPod music-players (at least not without a lot of fiddling), any iTunes buyer will be deterred from switching to a device made by a rival firm, such as Sony or Microsoft. When French lawmakers drafted a bill last year compelling Apple to open up FairPlay to rivals, the company warned of "state-sponsored piracy". Only DRM, it implied, could keep the pirates at bay.

  C. This week Mr. Jobs gave another explanation for his former defence of DRM: the record companies made him do it. They would make their music available to the iTunes store only if Apple agreed to protect it using DRM. They can still withdraw their catalogues if the DRM system is compromised. Apple cannot license FairPlay to others, says Mr Jobs, because it would depend on them to produce security fixes promptly. All DRM does is restrict consumer choice and provide a barrier to entry, says Mr Jobs; without it there would be far more stores and players, and far more innovation. So, he suggests, why not do away with DRM and sell music unprotected? "This is clearly the best alternative for consumers," he declares, "and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat."

  D. Why the sudden change of heart? Mr Jobs seems chiefly concerned with getting Europe's regulators off his back. Rather than complaining to Apple about its use of DRM, he suggests, "those unhappy with the current situation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free." Two and a half of the four big record companies, he helpfully points out, are European-owned. Mr Jobs also hopes to paint himself as a consumer champion. Apple resents accusations that it has become the Microsoft of digital music.

  E. Apple can afford to embrace open competition in music players and online stores. Consumers would gravitate to the best player and the best store, and at the moment that still means Apple's. Mr Jobs is evidently unfazed by rivals to the iPod. Since only 3% of the music in a typical iTunes library is protected, most of it can already be used on other players today, he notes. (And even the protected tracks can be burned onto a CD and then re-ripped.) So Apple's dominance evidently depends far more on branding and ease of use than DRM-related "lock in".

  F. The music giants are trying DRM-free downloads. Lots of smaller labels already sell music that way. Having seen which way the wind is blowing, Mr Jobs now wants to be seen not as DRM's defender, but as a consumer champion who helped in its downfall. Wouldn't it lead to a surge in piracy? No, because most music is still sold unprotected on CDs, people wishing to steal music already can do so. Indeed, scrapping DRM would probably increase online-music sales by reducing confusion and incompatibility. With the leading online store, Apple would benefit most. Mr Jobs's argument, in short, is transparently self-serving. It also happens to be right.

  Notes to Reading Passage 1

  1. low-key:

  抑制的,受約束的,屈服的

  2. showman:

  開展覽會的人, 出風(fēng)頭的人物

  3. unassuming:

  謙遜的, 不夸耀的, 不裝腔作勢的

  4. iPod:

  (蘋果公司出產(chǎn)的)音樂播放器

  5. iTunes store:

  (蘋果公司出產(chǎn)的)在線音樂商店

  6. get off person's back:

  不再找某人的麻煩,擺脫某人的糾纏

  7. gravitate:

  受吸引,傾向于

  8. unfazed:

  不再擔(dān)憂,不被打擾

重點單詞   查看全部解釋    
debate [di'beit]

想一想再看

n. 辯論,討論
vt. 爭論,思考

聯(lián)想記憶
champion ['tʃæmpjən]

想一想再看

n. 冠軍,優(yōu)勝者,擁護(hù)者,勇士
vt. 保衛(wèi)

 
benefit ['benifit]

想一想再看

n. 利益,津貼,保險金,義賣,義演
vt.

聯(lián)想記憶
unhappy [ʌn'hæpi]

想一想再看

adj. 不快樂的,不高興的

 
available [ə'veiləbl]

想一想再看

adj. 可用的,可得到的,有用的,有效的

聯(lián)想記憶
compelling [kəm'peliŋ]

想一想再看

adj. 強制的,引人注目的,令人信服的

 
promptly [prɔmptli]

想一想再看

adv. 敏捷地,迅速地

 
produce [prə'dju:s]

想一想再看

n. 產(chǎn)品,農(nóng)作物
vt. 生產(chǎn),提出,引起,

聯(lián)想記憶
vigorous ['vigərəs]

想一想再看

adj. 精力充沛的,元氣旺盛的,有力的

 
license ['laisəns]

想一想再看

n. 執(zhí)照,許可證,特許
vt. 允許,特許,

聯(lián)想記憶
?
發(fā)布評論我來說2句

    最新文章

    可可英語官方微信(微信號:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英語學(xué)習(xí)資料.

    添加方式1.掃描上方可可官方微信二維碼。
    添加方式2.搜索微信號ikekenet添加即可。
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 官网移动端充值| 国产高清一卡2卡3卡4卡乱码| 好看的国产动漫| 林书宇| 爸爸好奇怪 电视剧| 不速之客美国恐怖电影2014| 二年级上册数学试卷题全套| 春光外泄| 停止长高的3个预兆| 迷宫1意大利劳尔| 姐妹7完整版| 在路上 电影| 回收名表价格查询| 卧虎演员表| 影视剧分娩片段合集| 真相演员表| 香港毛片免费看| 免费播放高清完整版电影| 浙江卫视全天节目表| 演员于晓光| 结婚请帖怎么写| 房东电影| 员工的秘密| julia taylor| 性感的护士| 《爱的温暖》电影在线观看 | 抗日电影大突围完整版| 拔萝卜电影版| 天河电影演员表| 拨萝卜电视剧视频歌高清在线观看大牛| 奇妙的植物世界阅读短文答案| 贝利亚头像,权威| 色天使美国| 蛇花| 男士发型2024流行发型图片| cctv体育频道5| 蓝眼泪简谱| 古建凉亭生产厂家| 妈妈的花样年华演员表全部| 速度与激情 电影| 闪电11人|