評論
打印
真題回憶：Essay Prompt
>Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your opinion and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
實驗范文：OWL Essay
As can be argued, government rules can easily become obstacles to scientific achievements. Usually, most of the world's headline-making scientific discoveries do not come through governmental establishments, admitting that fiscal funding is often essential to helping such success to happen in the private sector. It is false to suggest that the government should carry out and control scientific research because the issue is not only about money but also brains.
Just because public funds matter, it does not follow that the government should restrict that kind of freedom of thinking which is vital to imaginative minds. Apart from that, nothing is more naive than for the government to play the role of police and rule research activities. Yes, freedom—that is how scientific breakthroughs are born. It goes without saying that probably billions of government's money may be needed to carry out research projects in various scientific fields, but it must be considered that great scientists tend to ignore, or even go against the rules. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how many scientific discoveries could have been missed as a result of unnecessary regulations. To put it strongly, control is the death of scientific research.
Scientific research should not be forced in any event. It is because a research problem is less likely to be solved by any apparatus which money can buy than to be solved by the brains of a free head that money cannot always buy. Thus, it does not seem proper for official amateurs to "know" what on earth scientists are doing. Otherwise, it would not be called "research" in the real sense of the word. Trying to heavily monitor scientific brains is perhaps a dangerous attitude since the consequence is always too much foliage and too little fruit. That can explain in part why the government ought to shift most of the pledged fiscal spending from the public to the private sector.
All aspects taken into account, scientific research is two things: billions and brains. With little doubt, the success in a country's scientific discoveries relies on both sufficient funding from the government and on creative minds from private companies in which pure research is worth every penny it costs. All the government has to do is grant money and expect that somewhere, something incredible is going to be known. (Created by Jeenn Lee Hsieh)
這一真題三年來出現三次。針對“科學研究”的雅思實驗范文是貓頭鷹參考隱形模板寫的。一般模板使用不靈是因為與你毫無關系。如果你用自己心思抄錄若干常用的套話（或廢話），再以DIY拼裝具有個人色彩的公式，結果保證勝過跟你不來電的模板。
貓頭鷹隱形模板：起3承6轉6合3=18句
起——立場不贊成。國家只顧出錢，民間出腦袋。
承——經費。
轉——頭腦。
合——經費+頭腦=科學研究。
別人的模板只可能成為寫作低分的跳板，原因是死死板板，頂多湊湊字數，其實格格不入。參考自己心愛的模板，臨考必然信心十足，與眾不同。
再出名的模板也會誤導菜鳥盲目地死背牢記，結果寫作成績還不是與其他菜鳥“埋葬”在一堆。不要抱怨評分考官的法眼不饒人，換成誰看了也覺得不以為然，甚至于啼笑皆非。所以自私一點兒，模板自制自用不外賣，則好處多多。如果新手缺乏零件造模板，剛好供應商貓頭鷹存心討好新手，將陸續在網頁上無償發布試用。
以下預告部分零件。指定品牌：貓頭鷹。（更切實際的是自行廣泛做閱讀，碰到喜歡又實用的話語筆記下來，時而學駱駝消化。熟讀自己的筆記，臨戰考場時自然能夠呼之欲出，好句連連，躍然紙上。）
