海外大學教師 Jeenn Lee Hsieh 投稿

Some people think developing countries should invite large foreign companies to open offices and factories to grow their economies. Others think the developing countries should keep large companies out and develop local companies instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

謝振禮小筆記：

——來自國際的投資意味利弊的沖突。作者的立場是開發中國家必須引進外資。這是主題。把沖突抽象化作為焦點。這是起段開頭。

——試題明白的指示考生討論不同的兩種立場。承段接頭論外資的好處。轉段轉頭論外資可能引起的弊病。

——合段回頭重申起段的主題大意。

——謝振禮老師的老花招之一是把抽象的沖突搞抽象化，也用具體的事物抽象化使用。文中所用的簡單名詞如--門，種子，植物，果實，花園，樹木，笑臉，甚至又龍又虎--一系列的抽象使用。寫作時如果采用抽象的概念或典故，會比較有話說。比方說，孔夫子論做學問，比喻為逆水行舟。有人比喻常勝將軍打敗仗為慘遭滑鐵盧。無辜受罪等于是被釘在十字架上。可不都是抽象比喻？悟其禪？

——結尾段的種子，果實，花園的比喻來自圣經: 創世紀 Genesis

——【隱形模板】如果沒有別人試用，謝振禮老師留來自己用。利用18句【起3承6轉6合3】的圓形邏輯，或者其它自定的模板，有利于避免跑題，爭取速度。句子寫多了，時間不足。寫少了，怕是字數不夠。

Example essay
Created by Jeenn Lee Hsieh

In order to let cash flow in, the door must be open. There is an increased awareness among developing countries that they cannot reach their expected economic potentials without attracting equity along with management support from large foreign companies. On the contrary, to keep foreign offices and factories out is to deny the need to court international money which can help plant entrepreneurial seeds for the local economy to grow.

For a developing country, little choice is seen but turn to foreign capitals. Over the past decades many developing countries have sought outside investments in what is called a win-win game benefitting foreign companies as well. The trend of such bilateral cooperation has become even more obvious in a world of globalization. Plenty of economic fruits are being shared by investing companies and local industries alike, and this can be proved by such succesful stories as Asian "dragons" or "tigers," big and small, and the smiling faces of capitalists, far and near. Thanks greatly to foreign offices and factories, the host nations and regions can long enjoy supercharged economic growth based largely on industrial policies supporting exports to rich, industrialized countries. Furthermore, economic prosperity leads to heavy government investments in education and high public and private saving rates, among other benefits.

There is a sense of fear in some people who argue that international investments could backfire in the long run. It is understandable that the policy to keep foreign offices and factories out is not so much a fear of foreign capital as a fear of foreign dominance. Although a developing country is in want of cash to grow its economy faster, it happens that money can just as well ruin national character. As investors search the planet for the highest returns, they are often drawn to places endowed with bountiful natural resources like timbers and mines, particularly where there are weak or ineffective laws or corruptions. Foreign investment-fed growth also promotes western-style consumerism, boosting car ownership, and Big Mac consumption rates towards levels beyond control. Deep at ideological heart, some developing countries have tried to restrict, even resist, foreign investments because of nationalist sentiments and concerns over economic and political influences.

In comparison, it is advisable for a developing country to carefully study where investments come from, as if selecting seeds for plants. The wise words of Genesis encourage people to select "every plant yielding seed and every tree which has fruit yielding seed." Good foreign investments may be like good seeds that grow good plants that bear good fruits that in turn yield good seeds. It is up to a developing country whether to keep its garden open to foreign seeds.