日韩色综合-日韩色中色-日韩色在线-日韩色哟哟-国产ts在线视频-国产suv精品一区二区69

手機(jī)APP下載

您現(xiàn)在的位置: 首頁(yè) > 英語(yǔ)六級(jí) > 六級(jí)真題 > 六級(jí)考試歷年真題 > 正文

2008年6月大學(xué)英語(yǔ)六級(jí)考試真題及答案

編輯:Baul ?  可可英語(yǔ)APP下載 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet

Passage Two

Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(癡迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go where.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t.

So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints.

注意 此部分試題請(qǐng)?jiān)诖痤}卡2上作答。

57.Why dose the author say that parengs are the true fighters in the college-admissions wars?

A.They have the final say in which university their children are to attend.

B.They know best which universities are most suitable for their children.

C.they have to carry out intensive surveys of colleges before children make an application.

D.they care more about which college their children go to than the children themselves.

58.Why do parents urge their children to apply to more school than ever?

A.they want to increase their children chances of entering a prestigious college.

B.they hope their children can enter a university that offers attractive scholarships.

C.Their children eill have have a wider choice of which college to go to.

D.Elite universities now enroll fewer syudent than they used to.

59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?

A.Continuing education is more important to a person success.

B.A person happiness should be valued more than their education.

C.Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.

D.What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.

60.What does Krueger study tell us?

A.GETting into Ph.d.programs may be more competitive than getting into college.

B.Degrees of prestigious universities do not guarantee entry to graduate programs.

C.Graduates from prestigious universities do not care much about their GRE scores.

D.Connections built in prestigious universities may be sustained long after graduation.

61.One possible result of pushing children into elite universities is that______.

A.they earb less than their peers from other institutions

B.they turn out to be less competitive in the job market

C.they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation

D.they overemphasize their qualifications in job application

重點(diǎn)單詞   查看全部解釋    
chronic ['krɔnik]

想一想再看

adj. 長(zhǎng)期的,慢性的,慣常的

聯(lián)想記憶
conversation [.kɔnvə'seiʃən]

想一想再看

n. 會(huì)話,談話

聯(lián)想記憶
selectivity [silek'tiviti]

想一想再看

n. 選擇性;分離性;選擇度

聯(lián)想記憶
dose [dəus]

想一想再看

n. 劑量,一劑,一服
vt. 給 ... 服

 
regenerate [ri'dʒenərit]

想一想再看

vt. 再生
adj. 再生的,復(fù)原的

聯(lián)想記憶
obvious ['ɔbviəs]

想一想再看

adj. 明顯的,顯然的

聯(lián)想記憶
insurance [in'ʃuərəns]

想一想再看

n. 保險(xiǎn),保險(xiǎn)費(fèi),安全措施

聯(lián)想記憶
valuable ['væljuəbl]

想一想再看

adj. 貴重的,有價(jià)值的
n. (pl.)貴

聯(lián)想記憶
contemptuous [kən'temptjuəs]

想一想再看

adj. 輕視的

 
employ [im'plɔi]

想一想再看

雇用,使用

 
?

最新文章

可可英語(yǔ)官方微信(微信號(hào):ikekenet)

每天向大家推送短小精悍的英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)資料.

添加方式1.掃描上方可可官方微信二維碼。
添加方式2.搜索微信號(hào)ikekenet添加即可。
主站蜘蛛池模板: 胡家玮| 亚洲免费资源| 耄耋老太国产| 护航 电影| 奈哈·西贡索邦| 上海东方卫视节目表| 郭明翔| 意大利诱惑| 那些女人电视剧免费观看全集剧情| 咖啡王子一号店| 奶酪鼠的穷途梦2| 康熙微服私访记1| 《特种兵之霹雳火》| 李泽锋个人资料| 成龙游戏| 北京卫视今晚节目表| abo血型鉴定实验报告| 快点受不了了| 新三国高清在线观看| 孔丽娜个人资料简介| 大学生国防论文2000字| 乱世三人行| 黄连厚朴电影| 乔治娅·格洛梅| 疯狂 电影| 碳水是指哪些食物| 电影《志愿者》观后感| 家族荣誉4| 欧美13| 11.27| 免费看污污的视频| 黄视频在线免费| 生死劫杀1946| 绝战电视剧免费观看40集完整版| 找到你 电影| 二年级第一单元测试卷数学| 应晓薇个人资料| 《荷塘月色》课文| 中专专业| 王琳琳个人资料及简历| 豪门本色|