評論
打印
Passage Two
I don’t ever want to talk about being a woman scientist again. There was a time in my life when people asked constantly for stories about what it’s like to work in a field dominated by men. I was never very good at telling those stories because truthfully I never found them interesting. What I do find interesting is the origin of the universe, the shape of space-time and the nature of black holes.
At 19, when I began studying astrophysics, it did not bother me in the least to be the only woman in the classroom. But while earning my Ph.D. at MIT and then as a post-doctor doing space research, the issue started to bother me. My every achievement—jobs, research papers, awards—was viewed through the lens of gender (性別) politics. So were my failures. Sometimes, when I was pushed into an argument on left brain versus (相對于) right brain, or nature versus nurture (培育), I would instantly fight fiercely on my behalf and all womankind.
Then one day a few years ago, out of my mouth came a sentence that would eventually become my reply to any and all provocations: I don’t talk about that anymore. It took me 10 years to get back the confidence I had at 19 and to realize that I didn’t want to deal with gender issues. Why should curing sexism be yet another terrible burden on every female scientist? After all, I don’t study sociology or political theory.
Today I research and teach at Barnard, a women’s college in New York City. Recently, someone asked me how may of the 45 students in my class were women. You cannot imagine my satisfaction at being able to answer, 45. I know some of my students worry how they will manage their scientific research and a desire for children. And I don’t dismiss those concerns. Still, I don’t tell them “war” stories. Instead, I have given them this: the visual of their physics professor heavily pregnant doing physics experiments. And in turn they have given me the image of 45 women driven by a love of science. And that’s a sight worth talking about.
62. Why doesn’t the author want to talk about being a woman scientist again?
A) She feels unhappy working in male-dominated fields.
B) She is fed up with the issue of gender discrimination.
C) She is not good at telling stories of the kind.
D) She finds space research more important
63. From Paragraph 2, we can infer that people would attribute the author’s failures to ________.
A) the very fact that she is a woman
B) her involvement in gender politics
C) her over-confidence as a female astrophysicist
D) the burden she bears in a male-dominated society
64. What did the author constantly fight against while doing her Ph.D. and post-doctoral research?
A) Lack of confidence in succeeding in space science.
B) Unfair accusations from both inside and outside her circle.
C) People’s stereotyped attitude toward female scientists.
D) Widespread misconceptions about nature and nurtured.
65. Why does the author feel great satisfaction when talking about her class?
A) Female students no longer have to bother about gender issues.
B) Her students’ performance has brought back her confidence.
C) Her female students can do just as well as male students.
D) More female students are pursuing science than before.
66. What does the image the author presents to her students suggest?
A) Women students needn’t have the concerns of her generation.
B) Women have more barriers on their way to academic success.
C) Women can balance a career in science and having a family.
D) Women now have fewer problems pursuing a science career.
這是一篇與性別歧視有關的文章，講的是女性應該如何面對性別歧視的問題。作者以第一人稱的形式，以親身的經歷來說明女性在面對性別歧視時應該采取不屑一顧的態度。
全文一共四個大段，開篇為I don’t ever want to talk about being a woman scientist again，以“again”一詞造成懸疑，引起讀者對原因的探究，而后整個第一段敘述了相對于這一again的上一次作者面對性別問題時的態度;并解釋了原因是興趣不在于此(I never found them interesting)。
第二段開始初步為“again”釋疑，敘述了作者從最初對性別問題的超然態度(it did not bother me in the least to be the only woman in the classroom)轉變為積極捍衛女性利益態度(I would instantly fight fiercely on my behalf and all womankind)的過程。
第三段進一步為“again”釋疑，敘述作者重又悟出應回歸超然態度的心理經歷。從Why should curing sexism be yet another terrible burden on every female scientist? After all, I don’t study sociology or political theory這一問一答可以看出，雖然多年過去，但作者用以對付性別問題這一心理重擔的利器依然是興趣(don’t study sociology or political theory)。
最后一段敘述了作者重歸超然態度后如何教導學生正確地面對性別問題。在有些學生因性別問題(如何在科學研究和生兒育女間的愿望之間做出選擇)而憂慮時，作者以身言教(heavily pregnant doing physics experiments)，告訴學生們應該忘記性別問題。作者的表率起了作用，像她們的老師一樣，學生們把精力完全放在了興趣上面(45 women driven by a love of science)。
文章的內容雖然涉及了社會問題，但切入角度是主觀第一人稱，語言修辭上更為接近散文(essay)的風格，所以相對于議論文、說明文較容易理解。
adj. 分布(或散布)廣的，普遍的
