日韩色综合-日韩色中色-日韩色在线-日韩色哟哟-国产ts在线视频-国产suv精品一区二区69

手機APP下載

您現在的位置: 首頁 > 在線廣播 > PBS高端訪談 > PBS訪談商業系列 > 正文

PBS高端訪談:盾牌和布魯克斯移民改革停滯

編輯:emma ?  可可英語APP下載 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet
  


掃描二維碼進行跟讀打分訓練

JUDY WOODRUFF: And to the analysis of Shields and Brooks. That’s syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Welcome, gentlemen.

MARK SHIELDS:Hey, Judy.

JUDY WOODRUFF:So let’s talk jobs, a report, mixed report for the month of January, Mark. The number of jobs created was less than what was expected, but the unemployment rate has gone down. You heard Paul Solman’s report. Should we be concerned?

MARK SHIELDS:Yes, we should be concerned.

This is 52 months after its ended, after this — and we are not returned to the number of jobs we had before the recession began. And at this rate, at the rate, the current rate of job creation, it will be six years before we get back to that level. It is — it’s hardly reassuring. It’s upsetting.

And it ought to get our attention. I would just say one thing, Judy, and that is, somewhere in recent American history, probably in the last 30 years, we changed our economic values. The economic value used to measure the economy in employment and how many people are employed, what their wages were. And then somewhere along the line, it became a stockholder, a shareholder economy.

Last year, corporate profits were at their all-time high. The percentage of — the percentage of the income that went to corporate profits and corporations was at their all-time high. The top 1 hazardous had their highest income share since 1928, and percent of the income that went to wages was the lowest it’s ever been. And something — something changed.

I mean, the health of our economy should be on the number of people working and that they are progressing and making more and being productive.

JUDY WOODRUFF:How do you see this?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, we do talk about the job numbers every week.

I do think we pay attention to labor force participation. I sort of do agree somewhat with Mark that there does seem to be an imbalance in the power relationship between capital and labor.

MARK SHIELDS:That’s — yes.

DAVID BROOKS:And I don’t think we’re going to go back to unions, the way they were understood before. I don’t know what the next form is, employee-owned companies.

But I do think you — there probably should be something done to rebalance that relationship. Nonetheless, when I look at the jobs numbers — and I think they’re disappointing. Somebody pointed out, if we were in a normal recovery, we would have six million more jobs than we have now.

And so I look at what’s causing all the sludge in the economy, whether we’re not innovating enough. And there’s some evidence of that, some stagnation in that. A lot of people have just dropped out of the labor force. And that long decline — Doug Elmendorf, the head of the CBO, was asked.

One of the things that is moderating growth, it’s the aging of the population, shrinking of the labor force. And if you don’t have a lot of people working, paying taxes, making stuff, you’re just going to have a sludgier economy. And so there’s a whole bunch of reasons. Some have to do with the complexity of the government, which imposes costs, the complexity of the tax code.

It just feels like we have been a middle-age or late-age economy, and we need some rejuvenation of some sort.

JUDY WOODRUFF:Is anybody predicting that this is going to turn around in a positive way, in a big, positive way?

MARK SHIELDS:Well, there’s sort of this prediction of economic growth, and that 2014 was supposed to be good, and the market at the end of the year.

The decade — the first decade of the 1st century is the only 10-year period in the country’s history, as long as we have kept records, that we didn’t create any jobs, that there was no net increase of jobs. I mean, that’s just amazing.

And one of the things that has happened in this recession, Judy, is that the brutal austerity imposed is the number of public jobs, state, local, federal, firefighters, teachers, nurses, public employees that have been laid off. And they have not come back. I mean, even this past month, we’re still laying off people in the public sector. And, to me, it’s sheer folly, both in public services and economically.

DAVID BROOKS:It should be said that the CBO also had a report on the projected debt of the country going up, and they basically raised the debt level by $1.7 trillion. We’re going to be ramping up our public debt levels massively over the next 20 years.

MARK SHIELDS:Twenty years.

DAVID BROOKS:And that’s — that’s — that’s part of the equation of why the public employment has not gone up.

I just feel like — you know, there’s — Mancur Olson, a great economist, late economists, said countries — why did Germany and Japan do so well after World War II? It’s because, perversely, they lost the war, but all their institutions were cleaned out and they started afresh.

And middle-age economies just get a little more brittle. And it feels like we’re in that. And I don’t know how you then rejuvenate the economy, how you have a second burst, or a third burst in our case, but that sort comprehensive thing has to be talked about.

JUDY WOODRUFF:Well, speaking of the debt, which you just brought up, we had the forecast, I guess today, from the government that in a few weeks they’re not going to be able to pay their bills unless Congress raises the debt ceiling.

The president is saying, I want this. I want it with no conditions.

Mark, Speaker Boehner is saying, there won’t be a default, but, on the other hand, he’s saying, my members are not yet on board. Where is this headed? What do you think?

MARK SHIELDS: It’s headed for a Kabuki dance.

I just — one point on David. David is absolutely right about the long-term debt. But as a percentage of the gross domestic product in this country, the deficit this year is lower than it was in Ronald Reagan’s years. OK? So that’s taken some of the urgency, because we do deal with the immediate in this country.

As far as the current crisis, Judy, it was revolved last October. The nuclear option was exercised by the Republicans last October. They closed…

JUDY WOODRUFF:When they shut down the government.

MARK SHIELDS:They shut down the government. The nuclear device blew up on the launching pad, and left the Republicans at the lowest point that any party has ever been in the history of the Gallup poll. They don’t want to go revisit that going into the 2014 election.

They’re going to try and ride the Obamacare horse to victory, I guess, to use just terrible metaphors all the way through.

MARK SHIELDS:And I know David will bail me out at this point.

JUDY WOODRUFF:And not — and not talk about…

MARK SHIELDS:No, I just don’t think — plus, I think the Patty Murray-Paul Ryan deal took an awful lot of pressure off as far as the fiscal picture is concerned in the short range.

JUDY WOODRUFF:So you think this is just a stalling thing and…

DAVID BROOKS:Yes, they’re going to reach a deal. I’m trying to figure out Mark’s Kabuki horse and metaphors.

MARK SHIELDS:The Kabuki horse is a — is a big concept.

JUDY WOODRUFF: I’m not stepping into that one.

DAVID BROOKS:Yes. Mark’s right. The polling is, if there was sort of a debt blowup, who would you blame, American people? It’s roughly 59 percent would blame Republicans, 20-something would blame President Obama, so it’s a clear political loser.

So, they have got to ask for something, and they have talked about asking for, if he can approve the Keystone pipeline, then will approve it. They just want something in return. They will probably end up with like half a Pretzel M&M. They will get that and they will sign. And so they’re not going to walk into that again.

MARK SHIELDS:No.

JUDY WOODRUFF:Well, the speaker, this is not the only headache on the speaker’s — headache on the platter — that may not work.

重點單詞   查看全部解釋    
immediate [i'mi:djət]

想一想再看

adj. 立即的,即刻的,直接的,最接近的

聯想記憶
forecast ['fɔ:kɑ:st]

想一想再看

n. 預測,預報
v. 預測

聯想記憶
analysis [ə'næləsis]

想一想再看

n. 分析,解析

聯想記憶
device [di'vais]

想一想再看

n. 裝置,設計,策略,設備

 
decade ['dekeid]

想一想再看

n. 十年

聯想記憶
concerned [kən'sə:nd]

想一想再看

adj. 擔憂的,關心的

 
approve [ə'pru:v]

想一想再看

v. 批準,贊成,同意,稱許

聯想記憶
election [i'lekʃən]

想一想再看

n. 選舉

聯想記憶
pipeline ['paip.lain]

想一想再看

n. 管道,管線

聯想記憶
blame [bleim]

想一想再看

n. 過失,責備
vt. 把 ... 歸咎于,

聯想記憶
?
發布評論我來說2句

    最新文章

    可可英語官方微信(微信號:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英語學習資料.

    添加方式1.掃描上方可可官方微信二維碼。
    添加方式2.搜索微信號ikekenet添加即可。
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 三年电影免费高清完整版 | 郑书允的10部作品| 李欣聪个人资料| 小绵羊男星是谁| 原野电影| 恋爱中的城市 电影| 北京卫视节目单今天| 河南省物业管理条例| 挠vk| 一键换装app永久免费| 超感警探第一季| 咒怨:终结的开始| 金刚狼1| 洛城僵尸在线观看| 电影《七三一》| 少年派3免费观看完整版电视剧| 赌神电影| 杨幂吻戏| 肖传国| 难兄难弟电视剧| 美食总动员在线观看完整版免费| 小组介绍| 王李丹妮全部三级| 美丽丽人| 新爱情乐园| 在线观看中文字幕视频| 降魔的| 好妻子全集免费完整版电视剧在线观看| 创业史全文免费阅读| 德兰| 欲罢不能德国版| 淡蓝色的雨简谱| 2024年血糖标准| 文琪演过的电视剧有哪些| 基础设施建设产业市场| 生产时直拍宫口| 张绍荣| 男生女生向前冲2014| 沈月个人简介| 古或仔| 一夜风流|